26 U.S.C. § 1044
Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, § 13313(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2133]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1936–1981 · leading case: United States v. Francis B. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1981).
United States v. Francis B. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1981). “1941) (conspiracy to sell, barter and exchange narcotics, charged under 26 U.S.C. § 1044 (1976); Gebardi v. United States, 287 U.”
Nigro v. United States, 117 F.2d 624 (8th Cir. 1941). “In one of the indictments he with eight others and "divers and numerous" other unknown persons were charged with a conspiracy to violate the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, Title 26 U.S.C. § 1044 ; section 2554, Title 26 U.”
Towbin v. United States, 93 F.2d 861 (10th Cir. 1938). “Counts 7 to 12, inclusive, are based upon title 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 (c) (1), charging that appellant unlawfully, willfully, knowingly, feloniously, falsely, and fraudulently did simulate, execute, and sign the record required by the revenue laws showing the amount dispensed and…”
Mullaney v. United States, 82 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1936). “§ 696 (now 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 (a, c-g) ; and the third count, charging unlawful concealment of morphine, is based on 21 U.”
State v. Fredell, 195 S.E.2d 300 (N.C. 1973). “1937), the defendant was convicted and sentenced on each of thirteen counts of an indictment charging violations of Section 2 of the Harrison Narcotic Act (26 USCA § 1044) . On appeal the defendant attacked the constitutionality of 26 USCA 1044(g), another subsection.”
United States v. Ginsburg, 96 F.2d 882 (7th Cir. 1938). “The first five counts respectively charged appellant with having sold to James McGovern, át different times, in September and October, 1937, separate amounts of certain narcotics, in violation of section 2 of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 (a). The fifth…”
Heller v. United States, 104 F.2d 446 (4th Cir. 1939). “Especially significant, as bearing upon this understanding, is evidence to the effect that certain prescriptions given by Heller were left undated by him so that they might be dated by Kuhn in such way as to present a record that would not excite the suspicion of the narcotic…”
Mauk v. United States, 88 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1937). “786 ( 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 ), which provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, barter, exchange, or give away any of the afore *558 said drugs [drugs mentioned in section 1040(a)] 1 *except in pursuance of a written order of the person to whom such article is sold,…”
Roberts v. United States, 96 F.2d 39 (8th Cir. 1938). “, 26 U.S. C.A. § 1044, which'were alleged to have been made between June 17 and June 25, 1936.”
Glatzmayer v. United States, 84 F.2d 192 (5th Cir. 1936). “The statute, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 (a), makes the crime to consist in selling, etc.”
Freeman v. United States, 86 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1936). “Code § 1044, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 ), assigns as error the action of the trial court in overruling his demurrer to each of the counts.”
United States v. Klein, 108 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1939). “The first count charged them with the sale of eight ounces and forty-eight grains of morphine to Andrew Koehn for $535, on June 1, 1938, without an order from him on a form issued by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, as required by 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 (a). The second count…”
— 26 U.S.C. § 1044(g) — 1 case
Mauk v. United States, 88 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1937). “786 ( 26 U.S.C.A. § 1044 ), which provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, barter, exchange, or give away any of the afore *558 said drugs [drugs mentioned in section 1040(a)] 1 *except in pursuance of a written order of the person to whom such article is sold,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.