U.S. Code » Title 26 » Subtitle Subtitle E— Alcohol, Tobacco, and Certain Other Excise Taxes › Chapter CHAPTER 51— DISTILLED SPIRITS, WINES, AND BEER › Subchapter Subchapter C— Operation of Distilled Spirits Plants › Part PART II— OPERATIONS ON BONDED PREMISES › Subpart Subpart A— General

26 U.S.C. § 5216

Regulation of operations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

For general provisions relating to operations on bonded premises see part I of this subchapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1959–1961 · leading case: United States v. James Giuliano, 263 F.2d 582 (3d Cir. 1959).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. James Giuliano, 263 F.2d 582 (3d Cir. 1959). “§ 5174 (a); 26 U.S.C. § 5216 (a) (1); and 26 U.S.C. § 5686 (b).”
L. B. McFarland v. United States, 273 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1960). “§ 5606 ; and (3) making and fermenting 4000 gallons of mash, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 5216 . The jury found the appellant McFarland guilty only on the count of illegal possession.”
Paul A. Kendall & Ruth Elder Kendall v. United States, 272 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1960). “Concluding as we do that the evidence in issue here was admissible under the findings of the trial court, its judgment is Affirmed. 1 . Count One charged possession of an unregistered still in violation of 26 U.”
Jimmie Griffin & Ray Stearns Moore v. United States, 269 F.2d 903 (4th Cir. 1959). “The indictment is phrased generally in the language of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5216 (a) (1), 5606 and 5686(b), the indictment containing a separate count charging a violation of each of those sections.”
United States v. Michael La Barbara, Hugh Callan, Dominick Piccirillo & Alexander Piccirillo, 273 F.2d 547 (2d Cir. 1960). “Count three charged fermenting mash, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5216 and 5608. 2 . Count five charged Reinard only with violating 26 U.”
United States v. Allison, 191 F. Supp. 443 (N.D. Cal. 1960). · cites it 3× “, 5216a D” Title 26 U.S.C. § 5216 (a) (1) provides, in part: “No mash, wort or wash, fit for distillation or for the production of spirits or alcohol, shall be made or fermented in any building or on any premises other than a distillery duly authorized according to law * * *»…”
Rossie Lee Hall v. United States, 279 F.2d 389 (7th Cir. 1960). “In Count II, he was charged with unlawfully making mash fit for distillation on premises other than a distillery duly authorized by law in violation of §§ 5216(a) and 5608, Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5216 (a), 5608; and, in Count III, defendant was charged…”
Claude Delbert Beavers v. United States, 287 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1961). “, 5216 a 1)” Title 26 U.S.C. § 5216 (a) (1), referred to in this count, reads in part: “No mash, wort or wash, fit for distillation or for the production of spirits or alcohol, shall be made or fermented in any building or on any premises other than a distillery duly authorized…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.