U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART I— ORGANIZATION OF COURTS › Chapter CHAPTER 5— DISTRICT COURTS

28 U.S.C. § 108

Nevada

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Nevada constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Carson City, Elko, Las Vegas, Reno, Ely, and Lovelock.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: United States v. James Dean Potter, 552 F.2d 901 (9th Cir. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. James Dean Potter, 552 F.2d 901 (9th Cir. 1977). “28 U.S.C. § 108 . However, the Jury Plan for the District of Nevada, promulgated pursuant to 28 U.”
Williams v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In Re Williams), 301 B.R. 62 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2003). “§ 61 (a)(12), unless the taxpayer is insolvent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 108 (a)(1)(B). II. APPLICABLE LAW Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(8) provides that student loans such as the New Loans at issue here are excepted from a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge unless the debtor shows that…”
Adler v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In Re Adler), 300 B.R. 740 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2003). “§ 61 (a)(12), unless the taxpayer is insolvent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 108 (a)(1)(B). There is no evidence of Husband’s age, though his attorney stated in argument without contradiction that he was 49 years old at time of trial.”
El Ranco, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Nevada, 406 F.2d 1205 (9th Cir. 1968). “Title 28 U.S.C. § 108 provides: “Nevada constitutes one judicial district.”
Ayen v. McLucas, 401 F. Supp. 1001 (D. Nev. 1975). · cites it 2× “The jurisdiction of the Court was invoked pursuant to the following statutes: Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 108 , 1361, 1651, 2201, 2202, and Title 5 U.”
Richardson v. Frazier, No. 3:22-cv-01447 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2022). “…a Nevada conviction, venue would be proper in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. See 28 U.S.C. § 108 .”
Both v. MAV Grp., LLC, No. 1:24-cv-08315 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2025). “§ 112 (c), and Defendants are in Las Vega, in the District of Nevada, 28 U.S.C. § 108 ; thus, nothing in the complaint suggests that any part of the events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims took place within this district.”
Both v. MAV Grp., LLC, No. 2:25-cv-00523 (D. Nev. Mar. 10, 2025). “§ 112 (c), and Defendants are in Las Vega, in the District of Nevada, 28 U.S.C. § 108 ; thus, nothing in the complaint suggests that any part of the events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims took place within this district.”
Provino, No. 1:26-cv-00172 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2026). “If the Court assumes that this action does not involve real property, because Plaintiff resides in the State of Nevada, venue would be proper under Section 1391(e)(1)(C) in the District of Nevada, see 28 U.S.C. § 108 , not in this district. Under 28 U.”
State ex rel. Norton v. Rush, 637 S.W.2d 7 (Mo. 1982). “Relators argue that 28 U.S.C. § 108 (1976) does not authorize the commission to enter into an agreement with the City of O’Fallon for acquiring right of way for extension of a road into the county.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.