U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART I— ORGANIZATION OF COURTS › Chapter CHAPTER 5— DISTRICT COURTS

28 U.S.C. § 126

Vermont

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Vermont constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Bennington, Brattleboro, Burlington, Montpelier, Rutland, Saint Johnsbury, and Windsor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Kumar v. Garland, No. 1:24-cv-04045 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kumar v. Garland, No. 1:24-cv-04045 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 112 (c), where Plaintiff resides, and in Vermont, within the District of Vermont, see 28 U.S.C. § 126 , where USCIS’s Vermont Service Center is located.”
Kane-Lee v. Warden of Rikers Island, No. 1:20-cv-01256 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2020). “Because Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Bennington, Vermont, which is located in the District of Vermont, see 28 U.S.C. § 126 , the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the District of Vermont.”
Williams v. Lorman, No. 1:23-cv-03258 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2023). “Plaintiff’s claims arose in Bennington and Westbury, Vermont, which are located in the District of Vermont, see 28 U.S.C. § 126 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Vermont, 28 U.”
Gravel v. Hearst Television, Inc., No. 1:23-cv-04527 (S.D.N.Y. May 31, 2023). “3 See 28 U.S.C. § 126 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Vermont, 28 U.”
Bradbury v. City of Montpelier, VT, No. 1:24-cv-03848 (S.D.N.Y. May 21, 2024). “See 28 U.S.C. § 126 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Vermont, 28 U.”
Hoisington v. WCAX-TV, No. 1:24-cv-04560 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2024). “Because Plaintiff alleges that WCAX-TV is “a for-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of, and having its principal place of business in, the State of Vermont” (ECF 1, at 1), it is clear that WCAX-TV resides, for venue purposes, in the District of Vermont, see…”
Williams v. Lorman, No. 2:23-cv-00077 (D. Vt. Apr. 20, 2023). “Plaintiff’s claims arose in Bennington and Westbury, Vermont, which are located in the District of Vermont, see 28 U.S.C. § 126 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Vermont, 28 U.”
Spencer v. Spencer, No. 1:25-cv-05800 (S.D.N.Y. July 17, 2025). “See 28 U.S.C. § 126 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Vermont, 28 U.”
Spencer v. Spencer, No. 2:25-cv-00671 (D. Vt. July 17, 2025). “See 28 U.S.C. § 126 . Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Vermont, 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.