Wisconsin is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Eastern and Western districts of Wisconsin.
Eastern District
(a) The Eastern District comprises the counties of Brown, Calumet, Dodge, Door, Florence, Fond du Lac, Forest, Green Lake, Kenosha, Kewaunee, Langlade, Manitowoc, Marinette, Marquette, Menominee, Milwaukee, Oconto, Outagamie, Ozaukee, Racine, Shawano, Sheboygan, Walworth, Washington, Waukesha, Waupaca, Waushara, and Winnebago.
Court for the Eastern District shall be held at Green Bay, Milwaukee, and Oshkosh.
Western District
(b) The Western District comprises the counties of Adams, Ashland, Barron, Bayfield, Buffalo, Burnett, Chippewa, Clark, Columbia, Crawford, Dane, Douglas, Dunn, Eau Claire, Grant, Green, Iowa, Iron, Jackson, Jefferson, Juneau, La Crosse, Lafayette, Lincoln, Marathon, Monroe, Oneida, Pepin, Pierce, Polk, Portage, Price, Richland, Rock, Rusk, Saint Croix, Sauk, Sawyer, Taylor, Trempealeau, Vernon, Vilas, Washburn, and Wood.
Court for the Western District shall be held at Eau Claire, La Crosse, Madison, Superior, and Wausau.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Alex J. Raineri, 670 F.2d 702 (7th Cir. 1982).
“28 U.S.C. § 130 (b). In years past, the bulk of activity was at Madison, but jury trials were held to some extent at the other places.”
United States v. Rod Hunt, 930 F.3d 921 (7th Cir. 2019).
“Defendants can readily and "objectively verif[y]" the boundaries of judicial districts by, for example, consulting 28 U.S.C. § 130 (b). United States v. Hudson , 908 F.”
United States v. Raineri, 521 F. Supp. 30 (W.D. Wis. 1980).
“I take judicial notice that 28 U.S.C. § 130 divides Wisconsin into Western and Eastern districts.”
United States v. Conant, 116 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (E.D. Wis. 2000).
“As this was an unfunded mandate, the court does not sit outside the Milwaukee Division. Next, 28 U.S.”
Bransted v. Schmidt, 324 F. Supp. 1232 (W.D. Wis. 1971).
“28 U.S.C. § 130 (a). Accordingly, those portions of the amended complaint concerning plaintiff’s June 9, 1970, appearance in Judge O’Connell’s court are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
United States v. Rod Hunt, No. 18-1198 (7th Cir. July 23, 2019).
“Defendants can readily and “objectively verif[y]” the boundaries of judicial districts by, for example, consulting 28 U.S.C. § 130 (b). United States v. Hudson, 908 F.”
Scott v. Thicklen, No. 1:24-cv-00067 (S.D. Miss. May 16, 2024).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 130 (a). III. CONCLUSION IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this civil action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division, under 28 U.”
Retzlaff v. Heartland Fin. USA, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-03755 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2022).
“It appears that Plaintiff, the property at issue, and Bank First are located in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, see 28 U.S.C. § 130 (a); and Heartland is located in the Northern District of Iowa, see 28 U.”
Rogers v. Hernandez, No. 1:22-cv-10627 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2022).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 130 (a). Accordingly, venue lies in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, 28 U.”
Flores v. Am. Fam. Ins., No. 1:23-cv-03683 (S.D.N.Y. May 2, 2023).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 130 (b). Accordingly, venue lies in the Western District of Wisconsin, 28 U.”
Flores v. Gonzalez, No. 1:23-cv-04490 (S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2023).
“See 28 U.S.C. § 130 (b). Accordingly, venue lies in the Western District of Wisconsin, 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.