28 U.S.C. § 82
Arizona
Arizona constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1930–2025 · leading case: United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison
United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison (1980)
“( 28 U.S.C. § 82 ). In creating the district courts, Congress provided ( 28 U.”
John Ippolito v. United States (1955)
“§ 89 , which enumerates eight cities in the Southern District where court is to be held — including Tampa and Jacksonville — read together with the reviser’s note to 28 U.S. C.A. § 82, 1 manifests a congressional intention that defendants should have a right to transfer criminal…”
Connor v. Real Title Corp. (1947)
“28 U.S.C.A. § 82 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v.”
Jennings v. Southern Ry. Co. (1930)
“137, 28 USCA § 82; Kern v. Huidekoper, 103 U. S.”
United States v. Roger Bitsinnie (2017)
“, the State of Arizona, see 28 U.S.C. § 82 ) when much of the territory of the Navajo Nation extends into New Mexico and Utah.”
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Mark Gutierrez (2021)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 82 . In 22 Ground Eight, Petitioner claims that her medical treatment has been delayed, 23 ignored, refused, and denied over the past five years, including while she was 24 incarcerated at FCI-Dublin and FCI-Phoenix.”
(PC) Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (2023)
“§ 1391 (b); 28 U.S.C. § 82 . 1 Plaintiff’s claims, while troubling, cannot survive screening.”
SILVA DOMINGUEZ v. WASHBURN (2023)
“28 U.S.C. § 82 . On February 28, 2023, Respondent filed a response wherein he does not oppose Petitioner’s motion to transfer.”
Wallace v. Bradley (2024)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 82 (stating that Arizona constitutes one judicial district).”
Pearce v. United States (2023)
“See 28 U.S.C. §§ 82 , 1391). The court has not required Pearce to refile his allegations on the complaint form prescribed for use in this district or to complete an in forma pauperis application.”
Parmentier v. United States of America (2022)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 82 ; https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/.”
McClain Jr. v. United States (2022)
“If Petitioner wishes to pursue relief under § 2241, it may be efficient for him to mail a § 2241 petition to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Based on the Motion, the Court cannot discern the legal theory that Petitioner wishes to pursue and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.