28 U.S.C. § 93

Illinois

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Illinois is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Central, and Southern Districts of Illinois.

Northern District

(a) The Northern District comprises two divisions.

(1) The Eastern Division comprises the counties of Cook, Du Page, Grundy, Kane, Kendall, Lake, La Salle, and Will.

Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Chicago and Wheaton.

(2) The Western Division comprises the counties of Boone, Carroll, De Kalb, Jo Daviess, Lee, McHenry, Ogle, Stephenson, Whiteside, and Winnebago.

Court for the Western Division shall be held at Freeport and Rockford.

Central District

(b) The Central District comprises the counties of Adams, Brown, Bureau, Cass, Champaign, Christian, Coles, De Witt, Douglas, Edgar, Ford, Fulton, Greene, Hancock, Henderson, Henry, Iroquois, Kankakee, Knox, Livingston, Logan, McDonough, McLean, Macoupin, Macon, Marshall, Mason, Menard, Mercer, Montgomery, Morgan, Moultrie, Peoria, Piatt, Pike, Putnam, Rock Island, Sangamon, Schuyler, Scott, Shelby, Stark, Tazewell, Vermilion, Warren, and Woodford.

Court for the Central District shall be held at Champaign/Urbana, Danville, Peoria, Quincy, Rock Island, and Springfield.

Southern District

(c) The Southern District comprises the counties of Alexander, Bond, Calhoun, Clark, Clay, Clinton, Crawford, Cumberland, Edwards, Effingham, Fayette, Franklin, Gallatin, Hamilton, Hardin, Jackson, Jasper, Jefferson, Jersey, Johnson, Lawrence, Madison, Marion, Massac, Monroe, Perry, Pope, Pulaski, Randolph, Richland, St. Clair, Saline, Union, Wabash, Washington, Wayne, White, and Williamson.

Court for the Southern District shall be held at Alton, Benton, Cairo, and East Saint Louis.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 85 cases (58 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: KM Enter. Inc. v. Global Traffic Tech. In, 725 F.3d 718 (7th Cir. 2013).
KM Enter. Inc. v. Global Traffic Tech. In, 725 F.3d 718 (7th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “shtml (last visited August 1, 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 93 (c) (Illinois counties within Southern District of Illinois).”
United States v. Darick Hudson, 908 F.3d 1083 (7th Cir. 2018). “28 U.S.C. § 93 (a) (specifying the Northern District of Illinois's two divisions and the counties comprising each).”
United States v. Evelyn Johnson, 911 F.3d 849 (7th Cir. 2018). “Anyone can look up the boundaries of this district, see 28 U.S.C. § 93 (c), and a person unable or unwilling to do that could look at the presentence report, which lists all counties in the district.”
Cont'l Ins. Co. v. M/v Orsula, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Fednav Int'l Ltd., & Atlant Adria Corp., 354 F.3d 603 (7th Cir. 2003). “28 U.S.C. § 93 (a). There is neither an option to file in multiple venues nor an ambiguity in the forum-selection clause.”
United States v. Billy R. Ashley, Shaunessy R. Sylvester, Craig Crofton A/K/A Craig C. Ashley, & Leroy Lambert, 54 F.3d 311 (7th Cir. 1995). “See 28 U.S.C. § 93 (b). 2 . See also Guy, 924 F.”
Porch-Clark v. Engelhart, 930 F. Supp. 2d 928 (N.D. Ill. 2013). “See 28 U.S.C. § 93 (a)(1). It follows that venue properly lies in this District.”
Kelly v. Stratton, 552 F. Supp. 641 (N.D. Ill. 1982). “Compare 28 U.S.C. § 93 (a)(1) (1976 & Supp. IV 1980) with Ill.”
United States v. Cordell Collins, 939 F.3d 892 (7th Cir. 2019). “”)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 93 (a) (defining the geo- graphic boundaries of the Northern District of Illinois).”
Allied Sound, Inc. v. Dukane Corp., 934 F. Supp. 272 (M.D. Tenn. 1996). “28 U.S.C. § 93 . The defendant’s request for oral argument (filed May 6, 1995; Docket Entry No.”
Mason v. Marathon Oil Co., 521 F. Supp. 1012 (S.D. Ill. 1981). · cites it 2× “Section 93 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. § 93 , shows that while the Northern District of Illinois is comprised of two divisions, see 28 U.”
I & M RAIL LINK v. Northstar Navigation, 21 F. Supp. 2d 849 (N.D. Ill. 1998). “11; 28 U.S.C. § 93 . Because the Northern District of Illinois has no local rule requiring divisional venue, I & M could have filed suit in either division.”
Carillo v. Darden, 992 F. Supp. 1024 (N.D. Ill. 1998). “28 U.S.C. § 93 (b).. Defendant Darden resides in Cook County, Illinois, which is located in the Northern.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.