29 U.S.C. § 1311

Repealed. Pub. L. 109–280, title V, § 501(b)(1), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 939

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1998 · leading case: United States v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, 754 F. Supp. 333 (S.D.N.Y. 1990).
United States v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, 754 F. Supp. 333 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “In 1977 Salvatore entered into a plea agreement with the Government pursuant to which he: plead guilty, to two counts charging violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1311 for aiding and abetting the willful failure to keep and maintain accurate and complete Plan records.”
Fanney v. Trigon Ins., 11 F. Supp. 2d 829 (E.D. Va. 1998). “See 29 U.S.C. § 1311 (e)(l)(pro-viding for state courts and federal district courts to have concurrent jurisdiction over claims for benefits).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.