29 U.S.C. § 167
Short title of subchapter
This subchapter may be cited as the “National Labor Relations Act”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2022 · leading case: Pasillas v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., 156 Cal. App. 3d 312 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984).
Pasillas v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., 156 Cal. App. 3d 312 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984). “( 29 U.S.C. § 167 .) This opinion will at times refer to the original section numbering of the NLRA but with parallel citation to the United States Code.”
Fleming v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., 36 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D. Conn. 1999). “Stop & Shop’s Motion for Summary Judgment The Union removed these actions to this Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction, specifically, 29 U.S.C. § 167 . However, given the Court’s determination that Fleming’s and Bimler’s claims against the Union cannot be…”
Ronald Hooks v. Nexstar Broad., Inc. (9th Cir. 2022). “; United States National Labor Relations Board, Seattle, Washington; for Petitioner-Appellee.”
MACNEILL v. Commonwealth (D. Mass. 2018). “’”); 29 U.S.C. § 167 (stating that 29. U.S.C. §§ 151-169 “may be cited as the ‘National Labor Relations Act’.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.