U.S. Code » Title 29 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— CONCILIATION OF LABOR DISPUTES; NATIONAL EMERGENCIES

29 U.S.C. § 175a

Assistance to plant, area, and industrywide labor management committees

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Establishment and operation of plant, area, and industrywide committees(1) The Service is authorized and directed to provide assistance in the establishment and operation of plant, area and industrywide labor management committees which—(A) have been organized jointly by employers and labor organizations representing employees in that plant, area, or industry; and(B) are established for the purpose of improving labor management relationships, job security, organizational effectiveness, enhancing economic development or involving workers in decisions affecting their jobs including improving communication with respect to subjects of mutual interest and concern.(2) The Service is authorized and directed to enter into contracts and to make grants, where necessary or appropriate, to fulfill its responsibilities under this section.(b) Restrictions on grants, contracts, or other assistance(1) No grant may be made, no contract may be entered into and no other assistance may be provided under the provisions of this section to a plant labor management committee unless the employees in that plant are represented by a labor organization and there is in effect at that plant a collective bargaining agreement.(2) No grant may be made, no contract may be entered into and no other assistance may be provided under the provisions of this section to an area or industrywide labor management committee unless its participants include any labor organizations certified or recognized as the representative of the employees of an employer participating in such committee. Nothing in this clause shall prohibit participation in an area or industrywide committee by an employer whose employees are not represented by a labor organization.(3) No grant may be made under the provisions of this section to any labor management committee which the Service finds to have as one of its purposes the discouragement of the exercise of rights contained in section 157 of this title, or the interference with collective bargaining in any plant, or industry.(c) Establishment of office

The Service shall carry out the provisions of this section through an office established for that purpose.

(d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the provisions of this section $10,000,000 for the fiscal year 1979, and such sums as may be necessary thereafter.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, § 205A, as added Pub. L. 95–524, § 6(c)(2), Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 2020.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesShort Title

For short title of section 6 of Pub. L. 95–524 as the Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978, see Short Title of 1978 Amendment note set out under section 141 of this title.

Congressional Statement of Purpose

Pub. L. 95–524, § 6(b), Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 2020, provided that: “It is the purpose of this section [enacting this section and amending sections 173 and 186 of this title]—“(1) to improve communication between representatives of labor and management;“(2) to provide workers and employers with opportunities to study and explore new and innovative joint approaches to achieving organizational effectiveness;“(3) to assist workers and employers in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution within the collective bargaining process;“(4) to study and explore ways of eliminating potential problems which reduce the competitiveness and inhibit the economic development of the plant, area or industry;“(5) to enhance the involvement of workers in making decisions that affect their working lives;“(6) to expand and improve working relationships between workers and managers; and“(7) to encourage free collective bargaining by establishing continuing mechanisms for communication between employers and their employees through Federal assistance to the formation and operation of labor management committees.”

Applicability to Collective Bargaining Agreements

Pub. L. 95–524, § 6(e), Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 2021, provided that: “Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section [enacting this section, amending sections 173 and 186 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section] shall affect the terms and conditions of any collective bargaining agreement whether in effect prior to or entered into after the date of enactment of this section [Oct. 27, 1978].”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: Trs. of the Heating v. Milestone Constr. Servs., Inc., 991 F. Supp. 2d 713 (D. Md. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Trs. of the Heating v. Milestone Constr. Servs., Inc., 991 F. Supp. 2d 713 (D. Md. 2014). “§ 186 (c)(9), and the Labor-Management Cooperation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. § 175a. (Id.) The Union is an unincorporated labor organization as defined by the Labor-Management Relations Act ("LMRA”).”
Prime Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Servs. Employees Int'l Union, 97 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (S.D. Cal. 2015). · cites it 3× “29 U.S.C. § 175a(a)(l)(A). Prime Healthcare also alleges that the Committee does not qualify as a legitimate industrywide labor management committee under the LMCA because one of the purposes of the CHA-UHW Agreement is to “discourage the exercise of an employee’s rights under…”
Prime Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Servs. Employees Int'l Union, 147 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (S.D. Cal. 2015). “78 (citing 29 U.S.C. § 175a note)) does not mean that the Committee is a multi-em-ployer bargaining unit that can collectively bargain on behalf of members with respect to labor relations.”
Mendota Elec., Inc. v. Fair Contracting Found., 144 F. Supp. 3d 1053 (D. Minn. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 186 (a) (LMRA) and the Labor Management Cooperation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 175a (LMCA). Mendota filed an amended complaint on Séptember 4, 2015, seeking a declaration that: (1) FCF is not a legitimate joint labor management committee, (2) FCF has exceeded its authority under the…”
Eighth Dist. Elec. Pension Fund v. Watts Elec., LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00622 (D. Colo. Dec. 28, 2021). “NLMCF and DJIPF are “labor- management cooperation fund[s]” created under the Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. §§ 175a(a), 186(c)(9), and are collection agents for NLMCF.”
Trs. of the Plumbers & Gasfitters Local 5 Ret. Sav. Fund v. Trinmar Contracting Servs., Inc., No. 8:21-cv-00058 (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2022). “§ 186 (c)(9), and Section 6 of the Labor-Management Cooperation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. § 175a, and trustees of a trust fund established and maintained according to its Trust Document.”
Trs. of the Nat'l Elevator Indus. Pension Fund v. Maple Mgmt. LLC, No. 2:19-cv-04305 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2020). “§ 186 (c)(9); 29 U.S.C. § 175a. The Plaintiff Funds are all governed by their Restated Agreements and Statements of Trust.”
Trs. of the Nat'l Elevator Indus. Pension Fund v. Hellman, No. 2:22-cv-02304 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2023). “29 U.S.C. §§ 175a, 186(c)(9). Defendant CEMD Elevator Corp.”
Trs. of the Heating v. Brother’s Mech., Inc., No. 8:25-cv-00962 (D. Md. May 1, 2026). “§ 186 (c)(9), and Section 6 of the Labor-Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (“LMCA”), 29 U.S.C. § 175a. Id. at ¶ 8. The Steamfitters Local Union No.”
Helix Elec. Inc. v. Div. of Labor Standards Enf't, 203 F. App'x 813 (9th Cir. 2006). “PWCP asserts that it is part of a joint labor-management committee (“LMC”) established pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 175a. California labor law grants any LMC the right to request payroll information and home addresses, but not the names, of workers at public work sites.”
29 U.S.C. § 175a(a): 1 case
Eighth Dist. Elec. Pension Fund v. Watts Elec., LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00622 (D. Colo. Dec. 28, 2021). “NLMCF and DJIPF are “labor- management cooperation fund[s]” created under the Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. §§ 175a(a), 186(c)(9), and are collection agents for NLMCF.”
29 U.S.C. § 175a(a)(l)(A): 1 case
Prime Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Servs. Employees Int'l Union, 97 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (S.D. Cal. 2015). “29 U.S.C. § 175a(a)(l)(A). Prime Healthcare also alleges that the Committee does not qualify as a legitimate industrywide labor management committee under the LMCA because one of the purposes of the CHA-UHW Agreement is to “discourage the exercise of an employee’s rights under…”
29 U.S.C. § 175a(a)(l)(B): 1 case
Prime Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Servs. Employees Int'l Union, 97 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (S.D. Cal. 2015). “29 U.S.C. § 175a(a)(l)(A). Prime Healthcare also alleges that the Committee does not qualify as a legitimate industrywide labor management committee under the LMCA because one of the purposes of the CHA-UHW Agreement is to “discourage the exercise of an employee’s rights under…”
29 U.S.C. § 175a(b)(3): 1 case
Prime Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Servs. Employees Int'l Union, 97 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (S.D. Cal. 2015). “29 U.S.C. § 175a(a)(l)(A). Prime Healthcare also alleges that the Committee does not qualify as a legitimate industrywide labor management committee under the LMCA because one of the purposes of the CHA-UHW Agreement is to “discourage the exercise of an employee’s rights under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.