U.S. Code » Title 29 » Chapter CHAPTER 20— MIGRANT AND SEASONAL AGRICULTURAL WORKER PROTECTION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER V— GENERAL PROVISIONS › Part Part B— Administrative Provisions

29 U.S.C. § 1863

Agreements with Federal and State agencies

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Scope of agreements

The Secretary may enter into agreements with Federal and State agencies (1) to use their facilities and services, (2) to delegate, subject to subsection (b), to Federal and State agencies such authority, other than rulemaking, as may be useful in carrying out this chapter, and (3) to allocate or transfer funds to, or otherwise pay or reimburse, such agencies for expenses incurred pursuant to agreements under clause (1) or (2) of this section.

(b) Delegation of authority pursuant to written State planAny delegation to a State agency pursuant to subsection (a)(2) shall be made only pursuant to a written State plan which—(1) shall include a description of the functions to be performed, the methods of performing such functions, and the resources to be devoted to the performance of such functions; and(2) provides assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that the State agency will comply with its description under paragraph (1) and that the State agency’s performance of functions so delegated will be at least comparable to the performance of such functions by the Department of Labor.(Pub. L. 97–470, title V, § 513, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2599.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: United States v. Clay, 159 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (M.D. Ala. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Clay, 159 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (M.D. Ala. 2001). “The middle district adopted a written plan for jury selection pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 1863 (a), 4 which was approved by the Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit on April 23, 1997.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.