29 U.S.C. § 564

Repealed. Pub. L. 115–245, div. B, title I, § 117(b)(1), Sept. 28, 2018, 132 Stat. 3067

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: UNITED STATES of Am., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PITT-DES MOINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, 168 F.3d 976 (7th Cir. 1999).
UNITED STATES of Am., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PITT-DES MOINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, 168 F.3d 976 (7th Cir. 1999). “, Congress clearly drew a distinction between “his employees” (see 29 U.S.C. § 564 (a)(2)) and “any employees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.