29 U.S.C. § 634
Authorization of appropriations
There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Brannigan v. Bd. of Educ. of Levittown Union Free Sch. Dist., 18 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005).
Brannigan v. Bd. of Educ. of Levittown Union Free Sch. Dist., 18 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). “Similarly, the defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the plaintiffs’ causes of action sounding in age discrimination, pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ( 29 USC § 634 ) (hereinafter the ADEA) and the New York…”
Vazquez v. E. Air Lines, Inc., 405 F. Supp. 1353 (D.P.R. 1975). “Not only is there nothing in the language of the ADEA to require this result, but the stated purpose of Section 14 (as indicated by its heading, “Federal-State Relationship”, and by its placement at the end of the Act just before the “Effective Date” and “Appropriations”…”
Pipkin v. Bridgeport Bd. of Educ., 323 F. Supp. 2d 326 (D. Conn. 2004). “, Count Four; age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 634 , Count Five; and intentional infliction of emotional distress, Count Two.”
Stein v. Town N Country Title LLC (E.D. Wis. 2020). “Paragraph 2 of the amended complaint states that the case involves “age discrimination in the workplace in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 634 et seq.” Dkt. No. 13 at ¶2.”
Leslie Anthony v. United Airlines, Inc. (4th Cir. 2026). “§ 621 to 29 U.S.C. § 634 ; and (VIII) harassment and discrimination on the basis of age, in violation of the ELCRA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.