29 U.S.C. § 796
Purpose
A prior section 796, Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, § 701, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VII, § 701(2),
Another prior section 796, Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, § 701, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title III, § 301,
2014—Par. (3). Pub. L. 113–128 substituted “subchapter VI” for “part B of subchapter VI” and inserted before period at end “, with the goal of improving the independence of individuals with disabilities”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2022 · leading case: Access Living of Metro. v. Uber Tech., Inc., 958 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2020).
Access Living of Metro. v. Uber Tech., Inc., 958 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2020). “See 29 U.S.C. § 796 . Like other centers, Access Living supports people with disabilities by providing “core services,” such as training on independent living skills.”
Ball ex rel. Burba v. Kasich, 244 F. Supp. 3d 662 (S.D. Ohio 2017). “The Ability Center is a nonprofit Ohio corporation operating as a *682 “center for independent living” pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 796 with the mission to improve the independence of individuals with disabilities, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities.”
United States v. State of New York, 700 F. Supp. 2d 186 (N.D.N.Y. 2010). “§ 791 (c) (policies and procedures will be developed as to the “hiring, placement, and advancement in employment of individuals who have received rehabilitation services under State vocational rehabilitation programs, veterans' programs, or any other program for individuals with…”
Justus v. Junction Ctr. for Indep. Living, Inc., 673 F. Supp. 2d 462 (W.D. Va. 2009). “See 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 796 -796l. (West 2008); Liberty Res.”
Grant v. New York State Off. of Mental Health, 169 Misc. 2d 896 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996). “), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 USC § 796 et seq.), the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 et seq.”
Access Living of Metro. v. Uber Tech., Inc. (7th Cir. 2020). “See 29 U.S.C. § 796 . Like other centers, Access Living supports people with disabilities by providing “core services,” such as training on independent living skills.”
Access Living of Metro. v. Uber Tech., Inc. (7th Cir. 2020). “See 29 U.S.C. § 796 . Like other centers, Access Living supports people with disabilities by providing “core services,” such as training on independent living skills.”
(PS) Anenson v. Vacaville Unified Sch. Dist. (E.D. Cal. 2021). “24 2020); see 29 U.S.C. § 796 (a) (Rehabilitation Act); see also 42 U.”
Liberty Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Statewide Indep. Living Council (E.D. Pa. 2022). “29 U.S.C. § 796 . In turn, CILs must provide community options for independent living, skills training, peer counseling and individual advocacy, among other services for people with disabilities.”
Isengard v. New Mexico Pub. Educ. Dep't, 708 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D.N.M. 2009). “See 29 U.S.C. § 796 . Centers for Independent Living organizations, which are government funded independent living rehabilitation services programs, are established throughout New Mexico and receive funding from the SILC Training and Development fund.”
Lassor v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 958 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). “We do note, however, that the United States government has funded Centers for Independent Living, see 29 U.S.C. § 796 — 796(f), which might be able to assist Ms.”
Robben v. U.S. Postal Serv. (10th Cir. 2000). “], and VII [ 29 U.S.C.A. §796 et seq.] of this chapter, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.