3 U.S.C. § 2

Repealed. Pub. L. 117–328, div. P, title I, § 102(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5233]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 3 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2020 · leading case: Trump v. The Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, No. 2:20-cv-01785 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2020).
Trump v. The Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, No. 2:20-cv-01785 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2020). “Plaintiff has since explained that he seeks a declaration that the Wisconsin general election was a failed election under 3 U.S.C. §2 , a declaration he argues is a predicate to allowing the Wisconsin Legislature to take action to determine the manner in which the state should…”
Fladell v. Labarga, 775 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · cites it 2× “3 U.S.C.A. § 2 . If a Florida court were to void the November 7, 2000 election for electors, it would then be up to the Florida legislature to appoint the electors under 3 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.