33 U.S.C. § 121
Repealed. Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, § 5, 65 Stat. 407
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1936–1957 · leading case: Nat'l Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. United States of Am., 183 F.2d 405 (2d Cir. 1950).
Nat'l Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. United States of Am., 183 F.2d 405 (2d Cir. 1950). “She had no lookout, in violation of Article 29, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 . In a crossing situation, she had the Nashbulk on her starboard hand and thus was bound to keep out of the way, Article 9, 33 U.”
Wood v. United States, 125 F. Supp. 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1954). “29 of the International Rules, supra, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 , requires moderate speed in conditions of low visibility regardless of whether the “visible distance” test of moderate speed is applicable or not.”
Pac.-Atl. S. S. Co. v. United States, 175 F.2d 632 (4th Cir. 1949). “” Article 29, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 . “Nothing in these rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner or master of crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to carry lights or signals, or of any neglect to keep a proper lookout, or of the neglect of any precaution which…”
United States v. the Australia Star, 172 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1949). “” 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 ; Lind v. United States, supra.”
Gertrude Parker, Inc. v. Abrams, 178 F.2d 259 (1st Cir. 1949). “29 of the International Rules, supra, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 , requires moderate speed in conditions of low visibility regardless of whether the “visible distance” test of moderate speed is applicable or not.”
United States v. The Adrastus Ocean S.S. Co., Ltd. v. United States. The George Westinghouse, 190 F.2d 883 (2d Cir. 1951). “…her. Consequently we hold both vessels at fault. Decree modified to hold each vessel for half damages. 1 . Art. 29, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 .”
Isthmian S. S. Co. v. Am.-Hawaiian S. S. Co., 112 F.2d 223 (9th Cir. 1940). “§ 221 , and International, 33 U.S. C.A. § 121, regulations, the general prudential and special circumstance rules, more clearly apply.”
Noble v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 96 F. Supp. 369 (D. Mass. 1951). “29 of the International Rules, supra, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 , requires moderate speed in conditions of low visibility regardless of wheth•er the ‘visible distance’ test of moderate speed is applicable or not.”
Hertz v. Consol. Fisheries, Inc. The Crescent No. 2, 213 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1954). “§ 112 , or Article 29, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 . We are persuaded that the term “boat” as used in Article 26 was sufficiently broad to cover all water craft.”
Peterson v. Permanente S.S. Corp., 277 P.2d 495 (Cal. Ct. App. 1954). “, the Great Lakes Rules, the Western River Rules (see 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 121 , 221, 293 and 351), is construed not as a permit to disregard other express rules, but as requiring under some circumstances additional precaution.”
Edwards v. Wilmington Transp. Co., 18 F. Supp. 461 (S.D. Cal. 1937). “§ 92 ), and 29 ( 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 ), of the International Rules for Navigation at Sea, Inland Rules, art.”
United States v. The SS Washington, 241 F.2d 819 (4th Cir. 1957). “” Article 29, 33 U.S.C.A. § 121 . “Nothing in these rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner or master or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to carry lights or signals, or of any neglect to keep a proper lookout, or of the neglect of any precaution which…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.