33 U.S.C. § 1313a

Revised water quality standards

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 33 CasesGoogle Scholar

The review, revision, and adoption or promulgation of revised or new water quality standards pursuant to section 303(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1313(c)] shall be completed by the date three years after December 29, 1981. No grant shall be made under title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.] after such date until water quality standards are reviewed and revised pursuant to section 303(c), except where the State has in good faith submitted such revised water quality standards and the Administrator has not acted to approve or disapprove such submission within one hundred and twenty days of receipt.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1995 · leading case: William J. Scott, on His Own Behalf & on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. City of Hammond, Indiana, 741 F.2d 992 (7th Cir. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

William J. Scott, on His Own Behalf & on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. City of Hammond, Indiana, 741 F.2d 992 (7th Cir. 1984). “1632 , 33 U.S.C. § 1313a. 8 . A proper citizen’s suit, for example, might arise in a situation in which a citizen seeks to compel the EPA to promulgate a substitute standard after the EPA has disapproved a state standard and the state has refused to act.”

Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Fox, 909 F. Supp. 153 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). “7 (citing 33 U.S.C. § 1313a). It may be that the effluent-limitation approach will meet the water quality standard, in that technology-based reduction of the discharge of pollutants into the particular body of water will ensure that the level of pollution in the water will be…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.