33 U.S.C. § 2071

Inland navigation rules

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 33 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue inland navigation regulations applicable to all vessels upon the inland waters of the United States and technical annexes that are as consistent as possible with the respective annexes to the International Regulations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: Morris v. State, 214 S.W.3d 159 (Tex. App. 2007).
Morris v. State, 214 S.W.3d 159 (Tex. App. 2007). “However, they subsequently have been repealed, effective on the effective date of final regulations prescribed under 33 U.S.C.A. § 2071 . Pub.L. No. 108-293, Title III, § 303(a)(c), 118 Stat.”
Larry Alexander v. Ingram Barge Co., 876 F.3d 269 (7th Cir. 2017). “See 33 U.S.C. § 2071 . The Claimants single out three rules that they contend Ingram violated: Rule 2, the Responsibility rule, 33 C.”
Klomp v. Frost (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2× “; and (3) 19 federal question jurisdiction arising under the Inland Navigation Rules, 33 U.S.C. § 2071 . 20 Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand on January 9, 2025, (Doc.”
Meador v. Aramark Sports & Ent. Servs. LLC (D. Ariz. 2022). “]” 33 U.S.C. § 2071 ; 33 C.F.R. 18 § 83.01(a).”
Reginald Eugene Morris v. State (Tex. App. 2007). “However, they subsequently have been repealed, effective on the effective date of final regulations prescribed under 33 U.S.C.A. § 2071 . Pub. L. No. 108-293, Title III, § 303(a)(c), 118 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.