33 U.S.C. § 2753
Repealed. Pub. L. 104–134, title I, § 101(c) [title I, § 109], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–177; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, § 1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1996–2005 · leading case: Conoco Inc. v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 309 (Fed. Cl. 1996).
Conoco Inc. v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 309 (Fed. Cl. 1996). “” 33 U.S.C. § 2753 (c)(1). To the extent the parties’ intent sheds light on the applicability of subsequent legislation, it is most doubtful that they intended that the North Carolina leases be governed by future or subsequent legislation such as the OBPA, which was enacted…”
Amber Resources Co. v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 535 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “In Mobil Oil, the Court examined the effect of the Outer Banks Protection Act (“OBPA”), 33 U.S.C. § 2753 (1994) (repealed 1996), on OCS oil and gas leases in North Carolina’s Outer Banks.”
Mobil Oil Expl. v. Brown, 920 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1996). “Section 6003 of the OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2753 , was termed the “Outer Banks Protection Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.