33 U.S.C. § 471
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1935–2013 · leading case: United States v. Citgo Asphalt Refining Co., 718 F.3d 184 (3rd Cir. 2013).
United States v. Citgo Asphalt Refining Co., 718 F.3d 184 (3rd Cir. 2013). “” 33 U.S.C. § 471 . By 1930, a “lack of ade *194 quate anchorage room” was creating a hazard on the Delaware River between navigating vessels and those “awaiting accommodation at the wharves, or awaiting cargo or orders.”
Barber v. Hawai'i, 42 F.3d 1185 (9th Cir. 1994). “33 U.S.C. § 471 . The argument is not persuasive.”
Hawaiian Navigable Waters Pres. Soc'y v. Hawaii, 823 F. Supp. 766 (D. Haw. 1993). “§ 1301 , the scheme of federal special anchorage grounds established pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 471 , and federal safety regulations set forth at 33 U.”
Norfolk S. Corp. v. Oberly, 632 F. Supp. 1225 (D. Del. 1986). “In May, 1983, the Coast Guard, pursuant to its authority under 33 U.S.C. § 471 , redesignated Big Stone Anchorage as a "general anchorage,” 48 Fed.”
Norfolk S. Corp. v. Oberly, 594 F. Supp. 514 (D. Del. 1984). “Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 471 , Big Stone Anchorage is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Coast Guard.”
City of Chattanooga, 79 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1935). “Section 471 of title 33 of the United States Code (33 US CA § 471) gives the Secretary of War power to define and mark anchorages and to provide regulations for their use.”
Spentonbush/Red Star Companies v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 106 F.3d 484 (2d Cir. 1997). “See 33 U.S.C. § 471 . A master of a tug at least 26 feet in length is subject to a penalty if he permits the tug to be operated by one not duly licensed to do so.”
Cnty. of Marin v. Roberts, 4 Cal. App. 3d 480 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970). “Congress has also authorized the establishment of anchorage grounds where necessary for safe navigation ( 33 U.S.C. § 471 ). The four drydocks here in question are outside the pierhead and bulk *487 head lines set up by the United States Army Corps of Engineers and are within…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.