33 U.S.C. § 702b

Local contribution toward cost of flood control work

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 33 CasesGoogle Scholar

It is declared to be the sense of Congress that the principle of local contribution toward the cost of flood control work, which has been incorporated in all previous national legislation on the subject, is sound, as recognizing the special interest of the local population in its own protection, and as a means of preventing inordinate requests for unjustified items of work having no material national interest. As a full compliance with this principle in view of the great expenditure estimated at approximately $292,000,000, prior to May 15, 1928, made by the local interests in the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River for protection against the floods of that river; in view of the extent of national concern in the control of these floods in the interests of national prosperity, the flow of interstate commerce, and the movement of the United States mails; and, in view of the gigantic scale of the project, involving flood waters of a volume and flowing from a drainage area largely outside the States most affected, and far exceeding those of any other river in the United States, no local contribution to the project herein adopted is required.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1929–1931 · leading case: Kincaid v. United States, 35 F.2d 235 (W.D. La. 1929).
Kincaid v. United States, 35 F.2d 235 (W.D. La. 1929). “In section 2 of the act (33 USCA § 702b), Congress, instead of adopting the suggestion of having the states contribute 20 per cent, of the cost of the work, estimated that they had already spent $292,-000,000 for like purposes, and declared this to be a “full compliance” with…”
Snowden v. Red River & Bayou Des Glaises Levee & Drainage Dist., 134 So. 389 (La. 1931). “” (Section 2, 33 USCA § 702b.) “Except when authorized by the Secretary of War, upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, no money appropriated under authority of sections 702a to 702m of this title shall be expended on the construction of any item of the project until…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.