36 U.S.C. § 114
Leif Erikson Day
The President may issue each year a proclamation designating October 9 as Leif Erikson Day.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1953–1994 · leading case: Morgan v. Vets. of Foreign Wars of United States, 565 N.E.2d 73 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990).
Morgan v. Vets. of Foreign Wars of United States, 565 N.E.2d 73 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990). “) Plaintiff argues that because the VFW has the power to regulate local chapters pursuant to Title 36, section 114 of the United States Code ( 36 U.S.C.A. § 114 (1988)), if such regulation is negligently performed, the VFW can be held liable.”
Crum v. Vets. of Foreign Wars, 502 F. Supp. 1377 (D. Del. 1980). “Defendant, in removing the case, describes the issue as a federal one because the VFW is a federally chartered corporation whose governing rules are authorized by federal statute ( 36 U.S.C. § 114 ) and should be interpreted by federal courts.”
Doe v. Am. Nat'l Red Cross, 845 F. Supp. 1152 (S.D.W. Va 1994). “§ 374 ; Veterans of Foreign Wars, 36 U.S.C. § 114 ; Veterans of World War I, 36 U.”
Stearns v. Vets. of Foreign Wars, 394 F. Supp. 138 (D.D.C. 1975). “, “to sue and to be sued in courts of law and equity,” 36 U.S.C. § 114 ; limited its membership to honorably discharged veterans of foreign service, which service entitled them to a recognized campaign medal, 36 U.”
Future Farmers of Am. v. Romack, 114 F. Supp. 796 (E.D. Ill. 1953). “Also note 36 U.S.C.A. § 114 (Veterans of Foreign Wars) where “exclusive” is used: “The corporation * * * shall have the following powers: * * * to adopt, and, have the exclusive right to manufacture and use such emblems and badges as may be deemed necessary in the fulfillment of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.