U.S. Code » Title 37 » Chapter CHAPTER 5— SPECIAL AND INCENTIVE PAYS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— EXISTING SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND BONUS AUTHORITIES

37 U.S.C. § 308a

Repealed. Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title VI, § 624(b)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–153]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 37 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1976–2020 · leading case: Prestonback v. United States, 965 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Prestonback v. United States, 965 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “2 Effective October 1, 2000, 37 U.S.C. § 308a was re- pealed by amendments made to subsection (b) of 37 U.”
Favreau v. United States, 317 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2002). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss count I is granted; defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to count II is granted; and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment is denied.”
Earl B. Collins, & Cross-Appellants v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, & Cross-Appellees & Other Consol. Cases, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976). “See 37 U.S.C. § 308a(b); H.Rep. No. 93-857, 93d Cong.”
Favreau v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 635 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “37 U.S.C. § 308a(b)(emphasis added). The Secretary of Defense is granted explicit authority to implement these provisions through regulations, and has done so.”
— 37 U.S.C. § 308a(b) — 4 cases
Prestonback v. United States, 965 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2020). “2 Effective October 1, 2000, 37 U.S.C. § 308a was re- pealed by amendments made to subsection (b) of 37 U.”
Earl B. Collins, & Cross-Appellants v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, & Cross-Appellees & Other Consol. Cases, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976). “See 37 U.S.C. § 308a(b); H.Rep. No. 93-857, 93d Cong.”
Favreau v. United States, 317 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss count I is granted; defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to count II is granted; and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment is denied.”
Favreau v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 635 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “37 U.S.C. § 308a(b)(emphasis added). The Secretary of Defense is granted explicit authority to implement these provisions through regulations, and has done so.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.