37 U.S.C. § 311
Repealed. Pub. L. 99–145, title VI, § 639(b), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 651]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1952–1985 · leading case: Geiger v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 647 (Ct. Cl. 1983).
Geiger v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 647 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “Also, as of 1978, there was in existence legislation ( 37 U.S.C. § 311 (1976)) which provided for “continuation pay” to be paid to certain medical and dental officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Public Health Service.”
Walter F. Freeman v. United States, 265 F.2d 66 (9th Cir. 1959). “Freeman first elected option “(b)” of § 511 of the 1949 act, 37 U.S.C.A. § 311 . Under this option compensation is computed on the basis of a formula established by the Career Compensation Act of 1949.”
Tracy v. United States, 142 F. Supp. 943 (Ct. Cl. 1956). “Section 511 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 37 U.S.C.A. § 311 was the applicable statute in the Cairnes case.”
Louis E. Fagan (Lewis L. Gover, No. 2) v. United States, 277 F.2d 469 (Ct. Cl. 1960). “802 , and plaintiff, a nondisabled retiree who had been retired prior to the effective date of that act for reasons other than physical disability, came under the provisions of section 511, Title V, 37 U.S.C.A. § 311 ,. which read in pertinent part as follows: “On and after the…”
Seliga v. United States, 149 F. Supp. 211 (Ct. Cl. 1957). “, or to receive the retired pay provided for in section 511 of the same Act, 37 U.S.C.A. § 311 . Plaintiff states that he did elect to qualify for the disability retirement pay provided for in section 402(d) of the 1949 Act on the percentage of disability method prescribed…”
J. Michael Geiger, Jr., M.D. v. United States of Am., the Dep't of the Army, the United States of Am. & Stuart, Richard B., Colonel, 707 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1983). “Prior to its amendment in 1980, 37 U.S.C. § 311 provided a special pay incentive, termed continuation pay, for military physicians and dentists who agreed to extend their terms of service on active duty.”
Lawrence McC Jones v. United States, 289 F.2d 825 (Ct. Cl. 1961). “802 , 37 U.S.C.A. § 311 , since October 1, 1949, which pay is the equivalent of 65 percent of the ’ basic pay of a colonel with over 26 years of service but less than- 30.”
William T. Colman v. United States, 292 F.2d 283 (Ct. Cl. 1961). “802 , 829, 37 U.S.C.A. § 311 , for the sole reason that plaintiff had served less than six months in that grade and “Hence, he does not meet the conditions which must be met before the Secretary is willing to determine that a member ‘satisfactorily held’ a higher temporary *285…”
Beaumont v. Orr, 601 F. Supp. 121 (D.D.C. 1985). “Plaintiffs challenge defendants’ position that the plaintiffs are ineligible for “continuation pay” as provided for by 37 U.S.C. § 311 and applicable Department of Defense and Air Force regulations.”
Day v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 10 (Ct. Cl. 1952). “802 , 82'9, 37 U. S. C. § 311 , that members of the uniformed services may receive retired pay based upon “the highest federally recognized rank, grade, or rating, whether under a permanent or temporary appointment, satisfactorily held, by such member * * Thus it is apparent…”
McLarren v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 497 (Ct. Cl. 1959). “” Section 511 of the Act, 37 U.S.C. § 311 , under which plaintiff is receiving military retired pay, provides that such pay shall equal 2*4% of his monthly basic active duty pay multiplied by the number of years of active service credited to him.”
Adams v. United States, 146 Ct. Cl. 489 (Ct. Cl. 1959). “802 , 829, 37 U.S.C. § 311 , in its section 511, provides, so far as here relevant: On and after October 1, 1949, (1) members of the uniformed services heretofore retired for reasons other than for physical disability, (2) members heretofore transferred to the Fleet Reserve or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.