38 U.S.C. § 1815
Monetary allowance
A prior section 1815 was renumbered section 3703(a)(2) of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Rank v. Nimmo, 677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982).
Rank v. Nimmo, 677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982). “Cohen offered the Ranks the alternative of selling their house, obtaining a second mortgage, or making monthly payments equal to 1.5 times the regular monthly payments.”
Turner v. Shinseki, 536 F. App'x 1012 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 38 U.S.C. § 1815 . However, because the appellant does not contend that she is a Vietnam veteran, her son is not eligible for benefits under the statute.”
210331-187529 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “210331-187529 DATE: October 30, 2021 ORDER Benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1815 for a child born with covered birth defects are denied.”
201215-187778 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “Entitlement to benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1815 and 38 C.F.R. § 3.815 for a child born with birth defects is denied.”
200323-187505 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “200323-187505 DATE: October 29, 2021 ORDER Entitlement to benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1815 for a child born with covered birth defects is denied.”
Pereida v. Collins (Fed. Cir. 2025). “Pereida was not entitled to benefits for a child born with certain non-spina-bifida birth defects to a Vietnam-veteran mother under 38 U.S.C. § 1815 , because the record did not show that Ms.”
Brandi Spain v. Shinseki, 524 F. App'x 712 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “” Under 38 U.S.C. § 1815 , a child may receive benefits if its biological mother is a Vietnam veteran and the child suffers from “any disability resulting from [one of several listed] birth defects.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.