U.S. Code » Title 38 » Part PART II— GENERAL BENEFITS › Chapter CHAPTER 23— BURIAL BENEFITS

38 U.S.C. § 2302

Repealed. Pub. L. 116–315, title II, § 2202(a)(2), Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4984]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 38 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2021 · leading case: Lillie M. Wingard v. Eric K. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 334 (Vet. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lillie M. Wingard v. Eric K. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 334 (Vet. App. 2013). · cites it 9× “Wingard, appeals through counsel a January 11, 2011, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that denied non-service-connected burial benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 2302 . Record of Proceedings (R.”
Mintz v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 277 (Vet. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “at 87-88; see also 38 U.S.C. §§ 2302 ; 2308. By letter dated April 24, 1989, appellant was advised that her application for DIC was approved.”
Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 214 (Vet. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “38 U.S.C. §§ 2302 , 2304; see also 38 C.F.”
Wingard v. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “§ 2303 and for burial benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 2302 (a)(1). The Board of Veterans Appeals, though granting her claim for a plot or interment allowance, denied her claim for burial benefits, and Ms.”
Kilpatrick v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 1 (Vet. App. 2002). “38 U.S.C. § 2302 (a)(1) (providing for payment of funeral and burial expenses where veteran did not die from service-connected disability but “at the time of death was in receipt of compensation”).”
Thompson v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 436 (Vet. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “In this case, the Court is faced with the questions of (1) whether the Board erred in holding that an application for dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC), containing a notation by appellant that “burial and vet[’]s medical bills are due but have not been paid,” is not…”
Turner v. Gober, 14 Vet. App. 224 (Vet. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “See 38 U.S.C. §§ 2302 , 2303(b)(2); R. at 16-17; Supplemental (Suppl.”
Osborne v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 368 (Vet. App. 1992). “The first issue presented here is whether the veteran qualifies for a burial allowance under 38 U.S.C. § 2302 (a)(1) (formerly § 902(a)(1)) and 38 C.”
Lillie M. Wingard v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 329 (Vet. App. 2015). · cites it 8× “Wingard, appealed a January 11, 2011, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied non-service-connected burial benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 2302 . On August 16, 2013, this Court affirmed the Board’s decision.”
15-08 051 (Board of Vet. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “38 U.S.C. §§ 2302 , 2303; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.”
191213-113074 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). · cites it 3× “38 U.S.C. §§ 2302 , 2303; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.”
13-09 937 (Board of Vet. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “Both the prior and amended regulations provide that a veteran who was receiving a nonservice-connected pension at his time of death may be awarded burial benefits in the amount as specified in 38 U.S.C.A. § 2302 . 38 C.F.R. § 3.1600 (b) (2013); § 3.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.