38 U.S.C. § 5121A
Substitution in case of death of claimant
Pub. L. 110–389, title II, § 212(c),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 202
cases (32 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: Charles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 7 (Vet. App. 2010).
Charles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 7 (Vet. App. 2010). “The issue we address is whether 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, recently enacted in 2008, applies to this appeal or otherwise forms a basis for allowing the substitution of the veteran's spouse to carry on this appeal.”
Constance Copeland v. Eric K. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 86 (Vet. App. 2012). “Copeland argues that (1) Congress's assignment of an effective date of October 10, 2008 (the date of enactment), for 38 U.S.C. § 5121A violated the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment of the U.”
Nat'l Org. of Vets. Advocates, Inc. v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 809 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2016). “Section 212 of the Act, codified as 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, authorizes eligible survivors to be “substituted as the claimant for the purposes of processing the claim to completion.”
Reeves v. Dept. Of Vets. Affairs, 682 F.3d 988 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “38 U.S.C. § 5121A. 6 Under this provision, an accrued- benefits claimant can be substituted for a veteran who dies while a “claim” or “an appeal of a decision with respect to such a claim .”
Sucic v. Wilkie, 921 F.3d 1095 (Fed. Cir. 2019). “Section 5121A provides that if the claimant dies, living people eligible to receive accrued benefits under § 5121(a) may be substituted as the claimant(s): If a claimant dies while a claim for any benefit under a law administered by the Secretary, or an appeal of a decision with…”
Charlotte Reliford v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 297 (Vet. App. 2015). “Reliford as a substitute beneficiary under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A and denied benefits for Mr.”
Hyatt v. Shinseki, 566 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “The new provision, codified at 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a)(1), provides: If a claimant dies while a claim for any benefit under a law administered by the Secretary, or an appeal of a decision with respect to such a claim, is pending, a living person who would be eligible to receive…”
Evelyn M. Todd v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 79 (Vet. App. 2014). “Todd to substitute under the auspices of 38 U.S.C. § 5121A. See Hyatt v. Shinseki, 566 F.”
William C. Rickett v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 240 (Vet. App. 2015). “4145 , 4151, now codified at 38 U.S.C. § 5121A). In addition, the Court may vacate the underlying Board decision to prevent it from acting as a barrier to the success of any future claimant seeking accrued benefits.”
Francis M. Jackson v. Eric K. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 460 (Vet. App. 2014). “between the deceased veteran's claim and that of the surviving eligible accrued-benefits claimant [and that a]ny distinction has been reduced to the administrative requirement of filing an accrued benefits claim 9 connection claim, the Court notes that in Hanlin, in addition to…”
Merritt v. Wilkie, 965 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2020). “2 We note that 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, which provides for substitution in VA proceedings, is consistent with this re- quirement.”
Crews v. McDonough, 63 F.4th 37 (Fed. Cir. 2023). “Yvonne Crews appeals the final decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims denying her request to be substituted under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A as the claimant in place of her deceased spouse.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(1) — 1 case
Reeves v. Dept. Of Vets. Affairs, 682 F.3d 988 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “38 U.S.C. § 5121A. 6 Under this provision, an accrued- benefits claimant can be substituted for a veteran who dies while a “claim” or “an appeal of a decision with respect to such a claim .”
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a) — 1 case
Virginia T. Mayfield v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a)(1) — 14 cases
Charles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 7 (Vet. App. 2010). “The issue we address is whether 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, recently enacted in 2008, applies to this appeal or otherwise forms a basis for allowing the substitution of the veteran's spouse to carry on this appeal.”
Sucic v. Wilkie, 921 F.3d 1095 (Fed. Cir. 2019). “Section 5121A provides that if the claimant dies, living people eligible to receive accrued benefits under § 5121(a) may be substituted as the claimant(s): If a claimant dies while a claim for any benefit under a law administered by the Secretary, or an appeal of a decision with…”
Charlotte Reliford v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 297 (Vet. App. 2015). “Reliford as a substitute beneficiary under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A and denied benefits for Mr.”
Hyatt v. Shinseki, 566 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “The new provision, codified at 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a)(1), provides: If a claimant dies while a claim for any benefit under a law administered by the Secretary, or an appeal of a decision with respect to such a claim, is pending, a living person who would be eligible to receive…”
Padgett v. Shinseki, 643 F.3d 950 (Fed. Cir. 2011).
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a)(2) — 1 case
Nat'l Org. of Vets. Advocates, Inc. v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 809 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2016). “Section 212 of the Act, codified as 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, authorizes eligible survivors to be “substituted as the claimant for the purposes of processing the claim to completion.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a)(3) — 1 case
Nat'l Org. of Vets. Advocates, Inc. v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 809 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2016). “Section 212 of the Act, codified as 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, authorizes eligible survivors to be “substituted as the claimant for the purposes of processing the claim to completion.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(a)(l) — 2 cases
Charlotte Reliford v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 297 (Vet. App. 2015). “Reliford as a substitute beneficiary under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A and denied benefits for Mr.”
Rusick v. Gibson, 27 Vet. App. 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
— 38 U.S.C. § 5121A(b) — 2 cases
Smith v. Collins, 133 F.4th 1059 (Fed. Cir. 2025).
Thomas Smith v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.