38 U.S.C. § 712
Repealed. Pub. L. 107–103, title V, § 509(a)(1), Dec. 27, 2001, 115 Stat. 997]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1962–1975 · leading case: Ted H. Taylor v. Elsie A. Roberts, Adm'x of the Est. of Larry W. Taylor, Also Known as Larry Warren Taylor, Deceased, 307 F.2d 776 (10th Cir. 1962).
Ted H. Taylor v. Elsie A. Roberts, Adm'x of the Est. of Larry W. Taylor, Also Known as Larry Warren Taylor, Deceased, 307 F.2d 776 (10th Cir. 1962). “1150, § 712, 38 U.S.C.A. § 712 . . Section 602 of the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, as amended by the addition of § 602(u) by the Act of August 1, 1946, 60 Stat.”
Mrs. Hazel D. Klish v. United States, 308 F.2d 371 (5th Cir. 1962). “Appellant bases her appeal on two main contentions: (1) insured had a right to reinstate the policy and he exercised that right by forwarding the non-medical application for reinstatement and by paying the premiums, and (2) that insured had a right to waiver of premiums as…”
Ferguson v. United States, 309 F. Supp. 632 (E.D. Va. 1970). “The provisions of law and regulation pertinent to waiver of premiums for National Service Life Insurance are in 38 U.S.C. § 712 and 38 C.F.R. § 8.40-43 , respectively.”
Carlson v. Carlson, 521 P.2d 1114 (Cal. 1974). “It is also significant that whereas the NSLI program provides that the government may waive payment of premiums upon application due to total disability ( 38 U.S.C. § 712 ), no similar provision is found in the EGLI program.”
Robinson v. United States, 281 F. Supp. 1021 (E.D. La. 1967). “Second, if such a review to re-determine his disability twelve years ago cannot be had in these proceedings, then the plaintiffs rely on an application for waiver of premium on behalf of the decedent on the grounds that he would have filed such a waiver timely, but was prevented…”
McNeil v. United States, 392 F. Supp. 713 (S.D. Ohio 1975). “38 U.S.C. § 712 (a) provides that upon application of the insured, payments of premiums on insurance may be waived during the continuous total disability of the insured.”
Goodrich v. United States, 219 F. Supp. 696 (W.D. Ark. 1963). “…today granting the motion of defendant and dismissing the complaint of plaintiff for lack of jurisdiction. . See 38 U.S.C.A. § 712 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.