U.S. Code » Title 39 » Part PART II— PERSONNEL › Chapter CHAPTER 12— EMPLOYEE-MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS

39 U.S.C. § 1206

Collective-bargaining agreements

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 39 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Collective-bargaining agreements between the Postal Service and bargaining representatives recognized under section 1203 of this title shall be effective for not less than 2 years.(b) Collective-bargaining agreements between the Postal Service and bargaining representatives recognized under section 1203 may include any procedures for resolution by the parties of grievances and adverse actions arising under the agreement, including procedures culminating in binding third-party arbitration, or the parties may adopt any such procedures by mutual agreement in the event of a dispute.(c) The Postal Service and bargaining representatives recognized under section 1203 may by mutual agreement adopt procedures for the resolution of disputes or impasses arising in the negotiation of a collective-bargaining agreement.(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 735.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.

Use of Funds for Restructuring of Employee Compensation Practices

Pub. L. 98–396, title III, § 303, Aug. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 1422, provided that: “None of the funds made available to the United States Postal Service under this Act [see Tables for classification] or any other Act may be used to restructure employee compensation practices as in effect under the most recently effective collective bargaining agreement under section 1206 of title 39, United States Code, except in accordance with the results of procedures set forth in section 1207 of such title.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases, 1975–2019 · leading case: Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Chertoff, 452 F.3d 839 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Chertoff, 452 F.3d 839 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “Indeed, no statutorily mandated collective bargaining system that we are aware of dispenses with the premise that negotiated agreements bind both parties— no matter what the scope of bargaining was ex ante.”
Malone v. United States Postal Serv., 526 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir. 1975). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 1206 the Postal Service and the Union executed a collective bargaining agreement which included a grievance and arbitration provision.”
Vivien L. Minor v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 819 F.2d 280 (Fed. Cir. 1987). “§ 1005 (a); 39 U.S.C. § 1206 . 2 . 5 C.F.R. § 353.307 declares: An employee who was separated because of a compensable injury and whose recovery takes longer than 1 year from the date compensation began (or from the time compensable disability recurs if the recurrence begins…”
Joan Bacashihua v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 811 F.2d 1498 (Fed. Cir. 1987). “§ 7121 and its implementing regulation are not applicable to the Postal Service, preference eligible employees in the Postal Service have both the right to appeal to the Board and to invoke the grievance procedures provided by the collective bargaining agreement specified in 39…”
Fraternal Order of Police, Nat'l Labor Council, USPS No. 2 v. United States Postal Serv., 988 F. Supp. 701 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). · cites it 2× “” 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b) (1980). It gives the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) the authority to supervise collective bargaining units within the Postal Service, 39 U.”
Osahar v. Postmaster Gen. of U.S. Postal Serv., 263 F. App'x 753 (11th Cir. 2008). “As we have previ *764 ously observed, Congress has already provided an adequate alternative means of obtaining redress in the form of “final and binding grievance provisions in the Postal Service collective bargaining agreements, 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b).” McCollum v. Bolger, 794 F.”
Bennett v. Barnett, 210 F.3d 272 (5th Cir. 2000). “” 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b) (1994). The collective bargaining agreement in effect during the actions described herein contained such provisions.”
Higgins v. United States Postal Serv., 655 F. Supp. 739 (D. Me. 1987). · cites it 2× “§ 9 ; 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b), and 28 U.S.C. § 1339 .”
Winston v. United States Postal Serv., 585 F.2d 198 (7th Cir. 1978). · cites it 3× “” As permitted by 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b), 4 article XV of the National Agreement set forth a series of steps in the grievance procedure which could culminate in binding third-party arbitration.”
Eure v. United States Postal Serv., 711 F. Supp. 1365 (S.D. Miss. 1989). · cites it 2× “Here, justice does not urge the requested amendment. Plaintiffs’ federal constitutional claims are susceptible to further fatal attack, even if the amendment be allowed.”
Local 300, Nat'l Postal Mail Handlers Union v. Nat'l Postal Mail Handlers Union, 764 F. Supp. 199 (D.D.C. 1991). · cites it 2× “” 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (c). The Act, however, prohibits strikes by postal employees.”
Jackson v. United States, 10 Cl. Ct. 691 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “” 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b) (1982). Such agreements are subject to 29 U.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
— 39 U.S.C. § 1206(b) — 1 case
Fraternal Order of Police, Nat'l Labor Council, USPS No. 2 v. United States Postal Serv., 988 F. Supp. 701 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). “” 39 U.S.C. § 1206 (b) (1980). It gives the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) the authority to supervise collective bargaining units within the Postal Service, 39 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.