U.S. Code » Title 4 » Chapter CHAPTER 1— THE FLAG

4 U.S.C. § 5

Display and use of flag by civilians; codification of rules and customs; definition

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 4 CasesGoogle Scholar

The following codification of existing rules and customs pertaining to the display and use of the flag of the United States of America is established for the use of such civilians or civilian groups or organizations as may not be required to conform with regulations promulgated by one or more executive departments of the Government of the United States. The flag of the United States for the purpose of this chapter shall be defined according to sections 1 and 2 of this title and Executive Order 10834 issued pursuant thereto.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2015 · leading case: United States v. Strandlof, 667 F.3d 1146 (10th Cir. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Strandlof, 667 F.3d 1146 (10th Cir. 2012). “, that the government lacks any state interest whatsoever in regulating the manner in which the flag may be displayed.”
Costanza v. Tchefuncte Harbour Ass'n, 31 F. Supp. 3d 849 (E.D. La. 2014). · cites it 3× “4 U.S.C. § 5 , entitled “Display and use of flag by civilians; codification of rules and customs; definition”, provides: The following codification of existing rules and customs pertaining to the display and the use of the flag of the United States of America is established for…”
Forrest Lake Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Billy B. Martin (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “572 (2005); 4 U.S.C.A. § 5 note; TEX. PROP. CODE ANN.”
United States v. Strandlof (10th Cir. 2012). “, that the government lacks any state interest whatsoever in regulating the manner in which the flag may be displayed.”
Constitutionality of Proposed Regulations of Jt. Comm. on Printing (OLC 1984). “4 4 U.S.C. § 5 0 2 Nor does § 502, which authorizes the Public Printer to obtain certain con­ tract work, expressly or impliedly endow the JCP with the power to regulate the activities of the Executive Branch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.