U.S. Code » Title 40 » Subtitle SUBTITLE I— FEDERAL PROPERTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES › Chapter CHAPTER 1— GENERAL › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL

40 U.S.C. § 122

Prohibition on sex discrimination

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Prohibition.—With respect to a program or activity carried on or receiving federal assistance under this subtitle, an individual may not be excluded from participation, denied benefits, or otherwise discriminated against based on sex.(b)Enforcement.—Subsection (a) shall be enforced through agency provisions and rules similar to those already established with respect to racial and other discrimination under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.). However, this remedy is not exclusive and does not prejudice or remove any other legal remedies available to an individual alleging discrimination.(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1070.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

122

40:476.

June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title VI, § 606, as added Pub. L. 94–519, § 8, Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2456.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title VI of the Act is classified generally to subchapter V (§ 2000d et seq.) of chapter 21 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of Title 42 and Tables.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644 (2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644 (2020). · cites it 2× “; Governing Body)  40 U. S. C. §122 (a) (Federal Property and Ad- ministrative Services; Prohibition on Sex Dis- crimination)  40 U.”
Anacostia Watershed Soc'y v. Babbitt, 871 F. Supp. 475 (D.D.C. 1994). “See 40 U.S.C. § 122 ; D.C.Code § 8-111. On July 13, 1993, the City Council also approved an agreement between the District, NCI and IDC covering the construction and financing of the proposed project.”
Island Dev. Corp. v. Dist. of Columbia, 933 A.2d 340 (D.C. 2007). “Second, because the Islands were owned by the United States of America, the National Park Service needed to transfer jurisdiction over them to the District of Columbia pursuant to 40 U.S.C. §§ 122 , 123 (1988), presently codified at 40 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.