41 U.S.C. § 2107
Savings provisions
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
2107 | 41:423(h). | Pub. L. 93–400, § 27(h), as added Pub. L. 100–679, § 6(a), Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4063; Pub. L. 101–189, title VIII, § 814(a)–(d)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1495; Pub. L. 101–510, title XIV, § 1484(l)(6), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1720; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, § 705(i), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 121; Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, § 8301(e), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3397; Pub. L. 104–106, title XLIII, § 4304(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 663. |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2023 · leading case: Mitchco Int'l, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020).
Mitchco Int'l, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “KOVR cites 41 U.S.C. § 2107 (1)-(2), which provides a safe harbor covering the receipt of information by persons authorized to receive that information and a contractor disclosure of its own bid or proposal information.”
Abacus Tech. Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2023). “(citing 41 U.S.C. § 2107 (1), (2)). Although the analysis could have ended with the holding that the safe-harbor provision foreclosed the protestor’s claim, the Federal Circuit went a step further.”
Whether the Dep't of Health & Human Servs. May Provide the Gov't Acct. Off. Access to Info. in the Nat'l Directory of New Hires (OLC 2011). “”); 41 U.S.C. § 2107 (5) (Supp. V 2011) (similar).”
GAO Access to Nat'l Directory of New Hires (OLC 2011). “”); 41 U.S.C. § 2107 (5) (Supp. V 2011) (similar).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.