Notes of Decisions
Pds Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 907 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
“41 U.S.C. § 8503 (a)(2). 3. The Small Business Act and Amendments Thereto The Competition in Contracting Act permits agencies to restrict competition for some federal contracts.”
Kansas ex rel. Kansas Dep't for Child. & Families v. SourceAmerica, 874 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2017).
“51-1, 51-2, 51-3, 51-4, and 51-6), and charged it with promulgating implementing regulations, see 41 U.S.C. § 8503 (d). The Commission oversees the so-called AbilityOne Program (Program), under which the Commission must “maintain and publish in the Federal Register a procurement…”
Akima Intra-Data, LLC v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 520 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
· cites it 6× “” 41 U.S.C. § 8503 (b). Once CFP adds a service to the procurement list, only qualified AbilityOne contractors are eligible to perform the work.”
Sekri, Inc. v. United States, 34 F.4th 1063 (Fed. Cir. 2022).
“See 41 U.S.C. § 8503 . Under the JWOD Act pro- curement system, if a federal agency intend[s] to procure a product or service on the pro- curement list .”
Nat'l Telecommuting Inst., Inc. v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 595 (Fed. Cl. 2015).
· cites it 3× “41 U.S.C. § 8503 (e). Under this mandate, the Committee selected National Industries for the Blind and SourceAmerica, previously named National Industries for the Severely Handicapped, as its designated central nonprofit agencies.”
Pds Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 117 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“41 U.S.C. § 8503 (d) (giving the Commission authority to add items to the procurement list); Administrative Record (“AR”) 708 (“Although the Javits-Wagner O’Day Act gives the Commission statutory authority to determine which products or services are suitable to be added to the…”
Sinai Hosp. of Baltimore, Inc. v. NLRB, 33 F.4th 715 (4th Cir. 2022).
“See 41 U.S.C. § 8503 (a). To obtain federal contracts through this procurement 22 list, qualified nonprofits — like VSP — must ensure that at least 75% of the “work-hours of direct labor required to furnish [their] .”
Sys. Application & Tech., Inc. v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 795 (Fed. Cl. 2012).
· cites it 3× “41 U.S.C. § 8503 . For a commodity or service to be suitable for addition to the Procurement List, each of the following criteria must be satisfied: (1) Employment potential.”
Kansas v. United States, 171 F. Supp. 3d 1145 (D. Kan. 2016).
“41 U.S.C. § 8503 . The CFP determines suitable products and services to place on the Procurement List and, once placed on the list, federal government entities must procure those products and services from qualified organizations that employ the blind and severely disabled.”
Msc Indus. Direct Co., Inc. v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 525 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“” 41 U.S.C. § 8503 (a)(1) (2012). Federal agencies intending to procure an item on the list must purchase it from a qualified nonprofit agency, if available.”
Melwood Horticultural Training Ctr., Inc. v. United States, No. 20-1884 (Fed. Cl. May 21, 2021).
· cites it 7× “” 41 U.S.C. § 8503 (c). As relevant here, AbilityOne designated SourceAmerica as a central nonprofit agency (“CNA”) which represents the interests of severely disabled people who provide services on the Procurement List.”
41 U.S.C. § 8503(a)(2): 1 case
Akima Intra-Data, LLC v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 520 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
“” 41 U.S.C. § 8503 (b). Once CFP adds a service to the procurement list, only qualified AbilityOne contractors are eligible to perform the work.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.