42 U.S.C. § 1001
Basic entitlement to benefits
Every individual who is a qualified individual under section 1002 of this title shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this subchapter, be entitled to a monthly benefit paid by the Commissioner of Social Security for each month after September 2000 (or such earlier month, if the Commissioner determines is administratively feasible) the individual resides outside the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 78
cases, 1936–2006 · leading case: Texas Co. v. Higgins, 118 F.2d 636 (2d Cir. 1941).
Texas Co. v. Higgins, 118 F.2d 636 (2d Cir. 1941). “This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover the amount paid to the defendant, a collector of internal revenue, as social security taxes under §§ 801 and 804 of Title VIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 , 1004. It was tried to a…”
Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States, 135 F.2d 715 (2d Cir. 1943). “, pages 636, 637, 639, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 , 1004, 1101. That question in turn depends upon the meaning of § 811(b), and § 907(c), of that act, 42 U.”
Fahs v. Tree-Gold Co-Op. Growers of Florida, Inc., 166 F.2d 40 (5th Cir. 1948). “They involve taxes for the period extending from January 1, 1937, to March 31, 1940, and for the calendar years 1937, 1938, and 1939, under Titles VIII and IX, respectively, of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 et seq., 1101 et seq.”
United States v. Mut. Trucking Co., 141 F.2d 655 (6th Cir. 1944). “, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 ét seq. and 1101 et seq.”
Lee v. MBNA Long Term Disability & Benefit Plan, 136 F. App'x 734 (6th Cir. 2005). “This is a case under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1001 , et seq seeking long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits.”
Jones v. Goodson, 121 F.2d 176 (10th Cir. 1941). “, of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., taxes are levied upon employers and employees, but this case concerns itself only with the tax on employers.”
Beeland Wholesale Co. v. Kaufman, 174 So. 516 (Ala. 1937). “The federal act designates the levy on employees as “Income Tax on Employees” (see Title VIII, 42 U. S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.). And while the Alabama act does not attempt to characterize the tax, it provides that “Each employee shall contribute to the fund one per centum of his…”
Allen v. Shelton, 96 F.2d 102 (5th Cir. 1938). “620 , 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 , 1004, 1007, 1101. Appellees are engaged in producing crude gum or oleo-resin by the scarification of living pine trees, and in processing the same for the production of gum spirits of turpentine and gum rosin.”
David Stevens v. Seacoast Co., 414 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir. 1969). “, and Social Security Law, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 et seq. 1101 et seq., United States v.”
Lincoln Mills of Alabama v. Textile Workers Union of Am., CIO, 230 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1956). “, and Social Security Law, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 et seq. 1101 et seq., United States v.”
Midwest Haulers, Inc. v. Brady, 128 F.2d 496 (6th Cir. 1942). “Appellant brought this action to enjoin the collection of additional taxes assessed against it under Titles VIII and IX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. and § 1101 et seq.”
Party Cab Co. v. United States, 172 F.2d 87 (7th Cir. 1949). “This is an appeal from a judgment adverse to the plaintiff (the taxpayer), entered January 21, 1948, in a suit to recover from the defendant taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected under the provisions of Title VIII and IX of the Social Security Act,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.