42 U.S.C. § 10803

Allotments

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary shall make allotments under this subchapter to eligible systems to establish and administer systems—(1) which meet the requirements of section 10805 of this title; and(2) which are designed to—(A) protect and advocate the rights of individuals with mental illness; and(B) investigate incidents of abuse and neglect of individuals with mental illness if the incidents are reported to the system or if there is probable cause to believe that the incidents occurred.(Pub. L. 99–319, title I, § 103, May 23, 1986, 100 Stat. 479; Pub. L. 102–173, § 10(2), Nov. 27, 1991, 105 Stat. 1219.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1991—Par. (2). Pub. L. 102–173 substituted “individuals with mental illness” for “mentally ill individuals” in two places.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 21 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Indiana Prot. & Advocacy Servs. v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin., 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Indiana Prot. & Advocacy Servs. v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin., 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2)(A). The Act gives each state a choice.”

Ind. Prot. & Adv. Servs. v. Ind. Fam. & Soc., 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2)(A). The Act gives each state a choice.”

Disability Advocates, Inc. v. New York Coalition for Quality Assisted Living, Inc., 675 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2012). “42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2)(A). .The designated P & A system may be either an independent state agency or a private entity.”

Iowa Prot. & Advocacy Servs., Inc. v. Gerard Treatment Programs, L.L.C., 152 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (N.D. Iowa 2001). “(citing 42 U.S.C. § 10803 ). “These organizations are intended to ‘investigate incidents of abuse and neglect of individuals with mental illness’ and to take appropriate action to ‘protect and advocate the rights of such individuals.”

Dunn v. Dunn, 163 F. Supp. 3d 1196 (M.D. Ala. 2016). “” 42 U.S.C.A. § 10803 . The other plaintiffs are a group of Alabama prisoners, who seek to represent putative classes of other prisoners.”

Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy, Inc. v. Czaplewski, 131 F. Supp. 2d 1039 (E.D. Wis. 2001). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2). Moreover, as such “system”, it “shall .”

Connecticut Off. of Prot. & Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities v. Hartford Bd. of Educ., 355 F. Supp. 2d 649 (D. Conn. 2005). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2). Such systems are authorized to “investigate incidents of abuse and neglect of individuals with mental illness” and “pursue administrative, legal, and other appropriate remedies to ensure the protection of individuals with mental illness who are receiving…”

Sonnenberg v. Disability Rights Idaho, Inc., 168 F. Supp. 3d 1282 (D. Idaho 2016). “42 U.S.C. § 10803 . Under PAIMI, states may designate either an independent state agency or a private entity as their P&A.”

Advocacy Ctr. v. Stalder, 128 F. Supp. 2d 358 (M.D. La. 1999). “42 U.S.C.A. § 10803 2 . In 1975, the Congress also adopted the Developmental Disabilities and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.”

Disabilities Rights Ctr., Inc. v. Comm'r, 732 A.2d 1021 (N.H. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2); see also 42 U.S.C.”

Indiana Prot. & Advocacy Servs. Comm'n v. Comm'r, Indiana Dep't of Corr., 642 F. Supp. 2d 872 (S.D. Ind. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 10803 . The designated system or entity must comply with the conditions of independence and authority set forth in 42 U.”

Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 107 (E.D. Pa. 1988). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10803 (2)(A). These “systems” shall have access to both patient’s records, 42 U.”

Show all 21 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.