42 U.S.C. § 1103
NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1937–2022 · leading case: New York Tel. Co. v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 440 U.S. 519 (1979).
New York Tel. Co. v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 440 U.S. 519 (1979). “" The "general account" is primarily made up of moneys derived from federal contributions under 42 U. S. C. § 1103 (a part of Title IX of the Social Security Act), the earnings on all moneys in the fund, and, occasionally, employer contributions.”
Carmichael v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 301 U.S. 495 (1937). “620 , 640, 42 U.S.C. § 1103 (a), are made prerequisite to its approval by the Social Security Board created by that Act, and it has been approved by the Board as that section directs.”
Timberson v. Div. of Emp. Sec., 333 S.W.3d 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). “The act contained amendments to 42 U.S.C. § 1103 pursuant to which the Secretary of Labor would provide incentive payments to states that enacted certain unemployment compensation provisions.”
Newton v. LePage, 700 F.3d 595 (1st Cir. 2012). “*598 The mural was paid for using both Maine and federal funds from the federal Reed Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1103 (regarding employment security funds); the Bureau of Labor Standards; the Bureau of Rehabilitation Services; the Center for Workforce Research and Information; and the MDOL…”
Chas. C. Steward MacH. Co. v. Davis, 89 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1937). “laws have been certified by the Social Security Board as conforming to certain standards specified in section 903 ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 1103 ). * If the Social Security Board and its function be unconstitutional, as is earnestly argued and as earnestly denied, the ini *210 mediate…”
Davis v. Boston & M. R. Co., 89 F.2d 368 (1st Cir. 1937). “§ 1101 ) can be termed an excise tax; and whether the federal government by section 903 of title *372 IX ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 1103 ) seeks indirectly to control state action in matters resting solely within the powers reserved to the states under Amendment 10 of the Constitution.”
In Re Siegelbaum's Inc., 38 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Conn. 1941). “, in conformity with the general conditions of 42 U.S.C.A. § 1103 , and to take advantage of the credit against the federal tax on employers allowed in respect of their contributions to a state fund.”
Glenn L. Martin Co. v. United States, 100 F.2d 793 (4th Cir. 1939). “Even though the taxpayer was under legal obligation to pay the state tax to the state, the fact remains that that tax was imposed in connection with the general system brought into being by the federal Act and payment thereof was recognized as satisfying 90% of the obligation…”
Unemployed Workers v. Ducey (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). “178 , 192–93 (amending Section 903 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1103 ). ¶13 Third, FPUC benefits did not morph into an “advantage[] available under” the social security act simply because the federal government used “Social Security infrastructure” and “methods of…”
Aponaug Mfg. Co. v. Fly, 17 F. Supp. 944 (S.D. Miss. 1937). “The Mississippi act was duly approved by the Social Security Board and such Board certified the Mississippi act to the Secretary of the Treasury under the provisions of section 903 of the Federal Act ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 1103 ) and such approval and certification have not been…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.