42 U.S.C. § 1384

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2022 · leading case: Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974).
Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974). · cites it 4× “The only language in the Social Security Act which purported to provide a federal sanction against a State which did not comply with federal requirements for the distribution of federal monies was found in former 42 U. S. C. § 1384 (now replaced by substantially similar…”
Owens v. Parham, 350 F. Supp. 598 (N.D. Ga. 1972). “42 U.S.C. § 1384 . 8 . As to the named plaintiff, the court notes that she has submitted an affidavit stating that her sons are in school, unemployed.”
Van Hook v. State of Idaho, No. 1:21-cv-00199 (D. Idaho Feb. 4, 2022). “651 (1974): The only language in the Social Security Act which purported to provide a federal sanction against a State which did not comply with federal requirements for the distribution of federal monies was found in former 42 U.S.C. § 1384 (now replaced by substantially…”
Ragonese v. Kijakazi, No. 1:20-cv-01636 (D. Del. Nov. 24, 2021). “521, 524 (1990) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1384 (1982 ed.)). 1 42 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.