42 U.S.C. § 1384

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2022 · leading case: Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974).
Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974). · cites it 4× “The only language in the Social Security Act which purported to provide a federal sanction against a State which did not comply with federal requirements for the distribution of federal monies was found in former 42 U. S. C. § 1384 (now replaced by substantially similar…”
Owens v. Parham, 350 F. Supp. 598 (N.D. Ga. 1972). “42 U.S.C. § 1384 . 8 . As to the named plaintiff, the court notes that she has submitted an affidavit stating that her sons are in school, unemployed.”
Van Hook v. State of Idaho (D. Idaho 2022). “651 (1974): The only language in the Social Security Act which purported to provide a federal sanction against a State which did not comply with federal requirements for the distribution of federal monies was found in former 42 U.S.C. § 1384 (now replaced by substantially…”
Ragonese v. Kijakazi (D. Del. 2021). “521, 524 (1990) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1384 (1982 ed.)). 1 42 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.