42 U.S.C. § 1861

Establishment; composition

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

There is established in the executive branch of the Government an independent agency to be known as the National Science Foundation (hereinafter referred to as the “Foundation”). The Foundation shall consist of a National Science Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) and a Director.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: name.space, Inc. v. Network Solutions, Inc. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 202 F.3d 573 (2d Cir. 2000).
name.space, Inc. v. Network Solutions, Inc. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 202 F.3d 573 (2d Cir. 2000). “NCR-9218742 (the “Cooperative Agreement”), awarded by NSF through a competitive process pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq., and the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act, 31 U.”
Dluhos v. Strasberg, 321 F.3d 365 (3rd Cir. 2003). “htm (providing an "Early History” of the NSF's involvement with the registration of domain names). In 1993, telecommunications-services provider NSI — a wholly owned subsidiary of VeriSign, Inc.”
Advocates for the Arts v. Meldrim Thomson, Jr., Etc., 532 F.2d 792 (1st Cir. 1976). “(graduate programs — grants and fellowships); 42 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq. (National Science Foundation).”
Collins v. Yellen, 594 U.S. 220 (2021). “§§2102 , 2103 (National Archives and Records Administra- tion); 42 U. S. C. §§1861 , 1864 (National Science Founda- tion).”
Thermalon Indus., Ltd. v. United States, 34 Fed. Cl. 411 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “” On September 6, 1988, NSF awarded a grant to plaintiff pursuant to NSF’s authority under the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, 42 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq., which authorizes NSF to promote scientific activities by entering “contracts or other arrangements,” 42 U.”
Wanda Henke & Robert Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1445 (D.C. Cir. 1996). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1861 et seq. NSF does not itself conduct research.”
PGMedia, Inc. v. Network Solutions, Inc., 51 F. Supp. 2d 389 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). · cites it 2× “) The solicitation was issued pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, 42 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq., as amended, and the Federal Cooperative Agreement Act, 31 U.”
Nat'l A-1 Advert., Inc. v. Network Solutions, Inc., 121 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.N.H. 2000). “The NSF awarded Network Solutions the Cooperative Agreement following a competitive process, pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1861 et seq., and the Federal Grant and Coop *162 erative Agreement Act, 31 U.”
Thomas v. Network Solutions, Inc., 2 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D.D.C. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 1861 . NSF’s primary function is to support and strengthen scientific research, engineering, and educational activity.”
United States of Am., ex rel. v. Cmty. Primary Care of Georgia, LLC (N.D. Ga. 2023). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 1861 (s)(2)(K)(i).7 Relator does not cite the relevant Georgia law, let alone attempt to plead that Defendant violated it.”
Collins v. Yellen, 594 U.S. 220 (2021). “§§2102 , 2103 (National Archives and Records Administra- tion); 42 U. S. C. §§1861 , 1864 (National Science Founda- tion).”
Collins v. Yellen, 594 U.S. 220 (2021). “§§2102 , 2103 (National Archives and Records Administra- tion); 42 U. S. C. §§1861 , 1864 (National Science Founda- tion).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.