U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 50— NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM

42 U.S.C. § 206

STUDY AND REPORT ON USE OF COST COMPLIANCE COVERAGE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
“Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [June 30, 2004], the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall submit to Congress a report that sets forth—“(1) the use of cost of compliance coverage under section 1304(b) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011(b)) in connection with flood insurance policies;“(2) any barriers to policyholders using the funds provided by cost of compliance coverage under that section 1304(b) under a flood insurance policy, and recommendations to address those barriers; and“(3) the steps that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has taken to ensure that funds paid for cost of compliance coverage under that section 1304(b) are being used to lessen the burdens on all homeowners and the Program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1960–2024 · leading case: Brooks v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 135 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brooks v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 135 (Fed. Cl. 2005). · cites it 7× “42 U.S.C. § 206 (b). Cf. PL’s App. at 194 (Commissioned Corps Personnel Manual (“CCPM”) CC23.”
Mansfield v. Billington, 432 F. Supp. 2d 64 (D.D.C. 2006). · cites it 2× “and retaliation under Title VII and the Equal Pay Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 206 et seq (“EPA”). The plaintiff alleges that the defendant discriminated against her by paying her a salary less than that paid to male employees holding the same position.”
Powell v. Castaneda, 390 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005). “The plaintiff alleges that the defendant: (1) violated the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 206 et seq., (2) discriminated against her on the basis of age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.”
Jones v. HCA (Hosp. Corp. of Am.), 16 F. Supp. 3d 622 (E.D. Va. 2014). “The plaintiffs Complaint appears to allege: (1) a violation of the Equal Pay Act, 42 U.S.C. § 206 ; (2) a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII, 42 U.”
Montgomery v. Chao, 495 F. Supp. 2d 2 (D.D.C. 2007). “The plaintiff, a financial specialist, additionally alleges that the defendant violated the Equal Pay Act ("EPA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 206 et seq., by paying him less than Thomas, a supervisory accountant, "despite the fact that they both performed COTR duties.”
Powell v. Castaneda, 247 F.R.D. 179 (D.D.C. 2007). “, and violations of the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 206 et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.”
Zarcone v. Perry, 438 F. Supp. 788 (E.D.N.Y 1977). “§ 1822 (b), the Communications Act of 1934, 42 U.S.C. § 206 , and the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.”
Lanasa v. City of New Orleans, 619 F. Supp. 39 (E.D. La. 1985). “§ 1822 (b), the Communications Act of 1934, 42 U.S.C. § 206 , and the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.”
United States v. Braud, 11 C.M.A. 192 (1960). “42 USC § 206 (b). And the Public Health Service is charged with providing medical care for Coast Guard personnel.”
Hall v. Saul (W.D.N.C. 2021). · cites it 2× “On July 23, 2020, Hall filed this action pursuant to “42 U.S.C. § 206,” which the Court construes as an action pursuant to 42 U.”
Holt v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Ga. 2024). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff sought attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justic Act (EAJA), 28 U.”
Deborah A. Lawrence v. Cooper Communities, 132 F.3d 447 (8th Cir. 1998). “Lawrence also initially filed a claim under the Equal Pay Act, 42 U.S.C. § 206 (d) (1994). However, Lawrence later moved to amend her Complaint to dismiss, this claim.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.