42 U.S.C. § 207
MINIMUM TRAINING AND EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: In Re Comput. Commc'ns, Inc., Debtor. Comput. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Codex Corp., 824 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1987).
In Re Comput. Commc'ns, Inc., Debtor. Comput. Commc'ns, Inc. v. Codex Corp., 824 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1987). “transferable or assignable” under 42 U.S.C. § 207 ); In re Dawson, 13 B.R. 107, 108-09 (M.”
Brooks v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 135 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “” 42 U.S.C. § 207 (a). The naval rank that corresponds with the grades of brigadier general and of major general is rear admiral (lower and upper half, respectively), and the Service ranks are 0-7 and 0-8.”
Castaneda Ex Rel. Est. of Castaneda v. United States, 546 F.3d 682 (9th Cir. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 207 . Although the statute defines PHS rank by equivalent U.”
Michael J. Salazar v. Margaret M. Heckler, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 787 F.2d 527 (10th Cir. 1986). “42 U.S.C. § 207 (a) (1982). 6. In time of war or emergency involving national defense proclaimed by the President, he may declare the PHS to be a military service constituting a branch of the land and navel forces of the United States and subject to the Uniform Code of Military…”
Aleck Alexander, Cross-Appellee v. United States of Am., Cross-Appellant, 500 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1974). “42 U.S.C. § 207 (1970). Regulations specify that failure to follow out orders of superior officers will result in disciplinary action.”
Levin v. United States, 403 F. Supp. 99 (D. Mass. 1975). “§ 201 (p) and 42 U.S.C. § 207 . 2 . 42 C.F.R. § § 21.262, 21.”
W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Qwest Corp., 734 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (D. Or. 2010). “§ 252 (e)(6), 42 U.S.C. § 207 , and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(a).”
Wanca v. Hargan (D.D.C. 2019). “42 U.S.C. §207 (d). 42 U.S.C. § 211 governs the promotion process.”
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (D. Maryland 2025). “§ 333 is not barred by the election of remedies statute in 42 U.S.C. § 207 (id. at 27–29), and further that its § 333 claim is not time barred under the continuing wrong doctrine (id.”
Multi Solutions Int'l, Inc. v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 265 F. Supp. 2d 1216 (D. Kan. 2003). “The plaintiffs contend the defendant’s argument is foreclosed by 42 U.S.C. § 207 which authorizes, in part, a private cause of action in federal district court when a person sustains damages for which a common carrier is liable under the FCA.”
Castaneda v. Henneford (9th Cir. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 207 . Although the statute defines PHS rank by equivalent U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.