42 U.S.C. § 27

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

The terms “State” and “States,” as used in this chapter, shall be held to include the District of Columbia.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Edmund Edwards v. Lee R. Bogdanoff (C.D. Cal. 2023).
Edmund Edwards v. Lee R. Bogdanoff (C.D. Cal. 2023). “In 26 addition, Congress has not repealed State sovereign immunity against suits under 42 U.S.C. § 27 1983. Further, a state or a state agency cannot be a party to an action based on diversity 28 jurisdiction.”
Watkins v. Collins (D. Ariz. 2025). “42 U.S.C. § 27 12102(1). 28 1 VI. Retaliation 2 An employer is prohibited from "discriminat[ing] against any of [its] employees .”
Watkins (D. Ariz. 2025). “42 U.S.C. § 27 12102(1). 28 1 FAC Att. (Doc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.