U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 6A— PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXIV— HIV HEALTH CARE SERVICES PROGRAM

42 U.S.C. § 300ff

Purpose

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the purpose of this Act to provide emergency assistance to localities that are disproportionately affected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic and to make financial assistance available to States and other public or private nonprofit entities to provide for the development, organization, coordination and operation of more effective and cost efficient systems for the delivery of essential services to individuals and families with HIV disease.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Cnty. of Nassau v. Leavitt, 524 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cnty. of Nassau v. Leavitt, 524 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “See 42 U.S.C. § 300ff (1991). The 1990 Act was modified on May 20,1996 by the Ryan White CARE Act Amendments of 1996 (“the 1996 Amendments”) and on October 20, 2000 by the Ryan White CARE Act Amendments of 2000.”
Fells v. State, 207 S.W.3d 498 (Ark. 2005). “Fourteen years ago, the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 300ff., was enacted for several purposes, including to provide emergency assistance to localities that are disproportionately affected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic.”
United States ex rel. Phipps v. Comprehensive Cmty. Dev. Corp., 152 F. Supp. 2d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). · cites it 2× “) The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 300ff et seq. (“White Act”), was enacted “to provide-emergency assistance to localities that are disproportionately affected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic and to make financial…”
Municipio Autónomo De Ponce v. United States Off. of Mgmt. & Budget, 809 F.3d 28 (1st Cir. 2015). · cites it 3× “576 (1990) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 300ff et seq.). Under “Part A” of the Act, the U.”
Municipio Autonomo De Ponce v. United States Off. of Mgmt. & Budget, 40 F. Supp. 3d 222 (D.P.R. 2014). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 300ff. Part A of the Ryan White legislation provides funding directly to eligible metropolitan areas (EMAs) who meet threshold levels of AIDS cases.”
Burks v. City of Philadelphia, 950 F. Supp. 678 (E.D. Pa. 1997). “42 U.S.C. § 300ff. 5 . Robb and Roberts allege that Scott rejected the hiring of a minority community group to trans *685 late AIDS information for Asian-American inmates at the Philadelphia prisons, (Roberts Dep.”
Doe v. Caremark, L.L.C., 348 F. Supp. 3d 724 (S.D. Ohio 2018). “OhDAP was initially established in 1990 under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300ff, et seq. This federal legislation has been renewed four times - 1996, 2000, 2006 and 2009 - and is now called the Ryan White Program within Ohio and nationwide.”
Us Ex Rel. Phipps v. Comprehensive Cmty., 152 F. Supp. 2d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). · cites it 2× “) The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 300ff et seq. ("White Act"), was enacted "to provide emergency assistance to localities that are disproportionately affected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic and to make financial…”
Aids Healthcare Found. v. Dep't Of Health (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 3× “FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency (CARE) Act and the subsequent Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act of 2009, 1 1 42 U.S.C. §§ 300ff et seq. The purpose of the legislation is to provide emergency assistance to localities…”
Davids v. Adams (D. Idaho 2025). · cites it 2× “135) to the extent it imposes an immigration status verification requirement for benefits under the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 300ff, et seq., and the 1 All Plaintiffs, but Dr.”
Cnty. of Nassau, NY v. Leavitt (2d Cir. 2010). “” 42 U.S.C. § 300ff. 1 Part A of the Act, titled 10 “Emergency Relief for Areas with Substantial Need for 11 Services,” directed HHS to award grants to localities that 12 qualified as “Eligible Metropolitan Areas,” or “EMAs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.