U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 68— DISASTER RELIEF › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV–B— EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

42 U.S.C. § 302

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Director $1,000,000 to carry out paragraphs (1) through (5) of section 301 and such sums as may be necessary to carry out paragraph (6) of such section.“(b) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 1982, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Director—“(1) $4,939,000 to carry out section 301, which amount shall include—“(A) not less than $700,000 to carry out the purposes of paragraphs (1) through (6) of such section;“(B) such sums as may be necessary, but in any case not less than $939,000, for use by the United States Fire Administration in carrying out paragraph (7) of such section; and“(C) not less than $3,300,000 to carry out paragraph (8) of such section with respect to those large California earthquakes which were identified by the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Committee on Assessment of Consequences and Preparations for a Major California Earthquake; and“(2) such further sums as may be necessary for adjustments required by law in salaries, pay, retirement, and employee benefits incurred in the conduct of activities for which funds are authorized by paragraph (1) of this subsection.“(c) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 1983, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Director—“(1) $2,774,000 to carry out section 301, which amount shall include—“(A) not less than $300,000 to carry out the purposes of paragraphs (1) through (6) of such section;“(B) such sums as may be necessary, but in any case not less than $939,000, for use by the United States Fire Administration in carrying out paragraph (7) of such section; and“(C) not less than $1,535,000 to carry out paragraph (8) of such section with respect to those large California earthquakes which were identified by the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Committee on Assessment of Consequences and Preparations for a Major California Earthquake and with respect to other high seismic risk areas in the United States; and“(2) such further sums as may be necessary for adjustments required by law in salaries, pay, retirement, and employee benefits incurred in the conduct of activities for which funds are authorized by paragraph (1) of this subsection.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54 cases, 1939–2020 · leading case: Mem'l Hosp. v. Maricopa Cnty., 415 U.S. 250 (1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mem'l Hosp. v. Maricopa Cnty., 415 U.S. 250 (1974). · cites it 2× “987 , 42 U. S. C. § 302 (b) (2), it added provisions to the Social Security Act requiring the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare to disapprove any state plan for medical assistance to the aged (Medicaid) that excludes "any individual who resides in the state," thus…”
Jefferson v. Hackney, 406 U.S. 535 (1972). · cites it 2× “See 42 U. S. C. §§ 302 (a) (11); 602 (a) (14); 1202 (a) (12); 1352 (a) (11).”
Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. Richman, 652 F.3d 360 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 302 (a)(11)(E) (Supp. II 1959-1961).”
Mcmullan v. Wohlgemuth, 308 A.2d 888 (Pa. 1973). · cites it 4× “569 , now codified at 42 U.S.C. § 302 (historical note) (emphasis added).”
Pearson v. State Soc. Welfare Bd., 353 P.2d 33 (Cal. 1960). · cites it 4× “Section 2 of title I ( 42 U.S.C. § 302 ) has always required that “(a) A State plan for old-age assistance must (1) provide that it shall be in effect in all political subdivisions of the State, and, if administered by them, be mandatory upon them; (2) provide for financial…”
Connecticut State Dep't of Pub. Welfare v. Dep't of Health, Educ., & Welfare, Soc. & Rehab. Serv., 448 F.2d 209 (2d Cir. 1971). · cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. §§ 302 , 602, 1202, 1316, 1352, 1396a.”
Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971). “620 , 42 U. S. C. § 302 (b); 49 Stat. 645 , 42 U.”
United States v. Connolly, 321 F.3d 174 (1st Cir. 2003). “, 42 U.S.C. § 302 (a)(7) (2000) (establishing safeguards to prevent public disclosure of information about Social Security recipients).”
Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, 697 P.2d 1 (Colo. 1985). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 302 (a)(1), 602(a)(1), 1202(a)(1) and 1352(a)(1) (1982).”
Rothstein v. Wyman, 303 F. Supp. 339 (S.D.N.Y. 1969). · cites it 3× “In the alternative, plaintiffs urge that § 131-a violates the provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 302 (a) (1), 1202(a) (1), 1352 (a) (1), 1382(a) (1), requiring that standards of need established under a cooperative federal-state assistance program be state-wide…”
Jeffries v. Swank, 337 F. Supp. 1062 (N.D. Ill. 1971). · cites it 4× “” 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 302 (a) (4), 602(a) (4) and 1352(a) (4).”
Nat'l Welfare Rights Org. v. Weinberger, 377 F. Supp. 861 (D.D.C. 1974). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 302 (a) (10) (A) (1970). The clause means that in determining the level of payments to make to an otherwise eligible recipient, the state must look to any other income, e.”
Show all 54 citing cases →
— 42 U.S.C. § 302(a)(10) — 1 case
Nat'l Welfare Rights Org. v. Weinberger, 377 F. Supp. 861 (D.D.C. 1974). “42 U.S.C. § 302 (a) (10) (A) (1970). The clause means that in determining the level of payments to make to an otherwise eligible recipient, the state must look to any other income, e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.