Notes of Decisions
Garcia v. Brockway, 526 F.3d 456 (9th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 10× “" 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (a)(1)(A). In other words, an aggrieved person must bring the lawsuit within two years of either "the occurrence .”
LeRoy Smithrud v. City of St. Paul, 746 F.3d 391 (8th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 8× “” 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (a)(1)(A). “The computation of such 2-year period shall not include any time during which an administrative proceeding under this subchapter was pending with respect to a complaint or charge under this subchapter based upon such discriminatory housing practice.”
A Soc'y Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (4th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 4× “The district court determined that ASWAN's FHA claims, which have a two-year statute of limitations, see 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (a)(1)(A), were also time barred because ASWAN filed suit more than two years after the opening of the Conrad Center.”
Boykin v. KeyCorp, 521 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2008).
· cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 3613 (a)(1)(A). However, "[t]he computation of such 2-year period shall not include any time during which an administrative proceeding under this subchapter was pending with respect to a complaint or charge under this subchapter based upon such discriminatory housing…”
United States v. East River Hous. Corp., 90 F. Supp. 3d 118 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
· cites it 10× “42 U.S.C. § 3613 (e). Independent of any aggrieved person, the Attorney General may also file suit in any appropriate federal district court where there is reasonable cause to believe that a person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern of practice of resistance to the full…”
Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 101 P.3d 140 (Cal. 2005).
· cites it 4× “" (See 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (c)(2) ["[T]he court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party .”
Fed. Aviation Admin. v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441 (2012).
· cites it 3× “C Looking beyond the Privacy Act’s text, respondent points to the use of the term “actual” damages in the remedial provisions of the PHA, 42 U. S. C. § 3613 (c), and the FCRA, 15 U.”
David Foster & Catherine Foster v. Sigmund Barilow & Margaret Barilow, 6 F.3d 405 (6th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 5× “On *407 June 2, 1992, the Barilows moved for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (e)(2). 2 On June 24, 1992, the Barilows requested an extension of time until July 6, 1992 so that they might submit additional papers in support of their motion for attorney’s…”
Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 133 S. Ct. 1166 (2013).
· cites it 2× “may award costs of suit and reasonable fees for attorneys and expert witnesses to the prevailing party”); 42 U. S. C. §3613 (c)(2) (Fair Housing Act) (“In a civil action .”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(1)(A) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(a) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(a)(1)(A) — 5 cases
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(a)(2) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(a)(I) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(b) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c) — 3 cases
Fed. Aviation Admin. v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441 (2012).
“C Looking beyond the Privacy Act’s text, respondent points to the use of the term “actual” damages in the remedial provisions of the PHA, 42 U. S. C. § 3613 (c), and the FCRA, 15 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c)(1) — 2 cases
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c)(2) — 2 cases
— 42 U.S.C. § 3613(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.