Notes of Decisions
Gladstone, Realtors v. Vill. of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91 (1979).
· cites it 14× “Under § 810, 42 U. S. C. § 3610 , [1] a "person aggrieved," *117 that is, "[a]ny person who claims to have been injured by a discriminatory housing practice," may seek administrative relief from the Secretary of the Department of Housing and *118 Urban Development and, if the…”
Boykin v. KeyCorp, 521 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2008).
· cites it 10× “" On September 27, 2001, Boykin received a letter from the HUD regional director for New York (the "referral letter") informing her that her complaint had been referred for investigation to the regional director of NYDHR in Buffalo pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3610 (f), which allows…”
United States v. East River Hous. Corp., 90 F. Supp. 3d 118 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
· cites it 8× “By letter dated December 12, 2012, HUD informed Aaron that it had referred her complaint to the New York State Division of Human Rights (“DHR”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3610 (f). 7 Id., Ex. K. The letter stated that DHR would “take all further action” on Aaron’s complaint unless…”
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Savin Rock Condo. Ass'n, 870 A.2d 457 (Conn. 2005).
· cites it 7× “The notice provision in § 46a-64c (f) conforms the state’s time limitations to those of its federal counterpart, specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 3610 (a) (1), which provides in relevant part: “(B) Upon the filing of [a housing discrimination] complaint .”
United Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Metro. Human Relations Comm'n, 24 F.3d 1008 (7th Cir. 1994).
· cites it 7× “Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3610 (f)(1), HUD must refer to local or state agencies the investigation of a complaint made under the federal Fair Housing Act if the claim is *1013 within the jurisdiction of the agency and the agency has been certified.”
Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman, 455 U.S. 363 (1982).
· cites it 2× “205 (1972), on which Bellwood relied, we held that two tenants one black and one white of an apartment complex had standing to sue under § 810(a) of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U. S. C. § 3610 (a), in challenging the alleged racial steering practices of their landlord.”
United States v. Forest Dale, Inc., 818 F. Supp. 954 (N.D. Tex. 1993).
· cites it 11× “HUD determined that there was reasonable cause to believe that a violation of the Fair Housing Act occurred and, on April 2, 1992, issued a charge of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 3610 . While the resulting administrative proceeding arising out of Cooksey’s complaint was…”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Bailey Co., 563 F.2d 439 (6th Cir. 1977).
· cites it 4× “The Supreme Court held that the definition of “person aggrieved” contained in § 810(a) of Title VIII, 42 U.S.C. § 3610 (a), “showed a congressional intent to define standing as broadly as is permitted by Article III of the Constitution” and that the tenants in the case had…”
United States v. Taigen & Sons, Inc., 303 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (D. Idaho 2003).
· cites it 6× “” 42 U.S.C. § 3610 (a)(l)(B)(iv). HUD is to determine “whether reasonable cause exists to believe that a discriminatory housing practice has occurred or is about to occur.”
Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (1997).
“85 , 42 U. S. C. § 3610 (a) (1986 ed.), that authorized *166 “[a]ny person who claims to have been injured by a discriminatory housing practice” to sue for violations of the Act.”
42 U.S.C. § 3610(a): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 3610(a)(1)(B)(iv): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 3610(d): 2 cases
42 U.S.C. § 3610(f): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.