42 U.S.C. § 3756
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1996–2015 · leading case: Opinion of the Justices to the Senate, 668 N.E.2d 738 (Mass. 1996).
Opinion of the Justices to the Senate, 668 N.E.2d 738 (Mass. 1996). “42 U.S.C. §§ 3756 & 14071(f). The statute requires *1209 registration of “a person who is convicted of a criminal offense against a victim who is a minor or who is convicted of a sexually violent offense .”
In the Matter of Registrant A.D., 119 A.3d 241 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2015). “§ 14071 (g)(2), ten percent of certain funding that would otherwise be allocated to the States under 42 U.S.C.A. § 3756 . [In re L.E., 366 N.J.”
Doe v. Dept. of Pub. Saf. ex rel. Lee, 271 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 2001). “Federal law renders states that fail to enact such laws ineligible for ten percent of a formula grant that they would otherwise receive under the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Program, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 3756 . See 42 U.S.C. § 14071…”
Creekmore v. Attorney Gen. of Texas, 116 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D. Tex. 2000). “4328 (1988), and recodi-fied in 42 U.S.C. § 3756 . Section 3756 now allocates funds to each participating states.”
State v. Superior Court, 930 P.2d 488 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “” See 42 U.S.C.A § 3756(f). 5 . See note 1 supra.”
People v. J. G., 171 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996). “The memorandum indicates two justifications for the bill’s passage: (1) to obtain Federal anti-drug funding (see, 42 USC § 3756 [f] [2], [3]; 18 USC § 2246 [2] [A], [B]); and (2) that it would lessen the trauma for victims who are seeking this information.”
People v. Griffin, 171 Misc. 2d 145 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996). “3, 1996]), which conditions full funding under section 506 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Pub L 90-351, as added by Pub L 100-690, 102 US Stat 4334, codified at 42 USC § 3756 ) upon a State’s enactment of a registration and tracking system of…”
People v. Doe, 169 Misc. 2d 29 (1996). “(See, 42 USC § 3756 [f] [2], [3]; 18 USC § 2246 [2] [A], [B].”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3756(f) — 1 case
State v. Superior Court, 930 P.2d 488 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “” See 42 U.S.C.A § 3756(f). 5 . See note 1 supra.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.