42 U.S.C. § 3771
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1974–1981 · leading case: John Brent Tarlton, Jr. v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 507 F.2d 1116 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
John Brent Tarlton, Jr. v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 507 F.2d 1116 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “Ill 1973), which in pertinent part requires that all “criminal history information” maintained by “State and local governments” with LEAA funds shall “to the maximum extent feasible” include ultimate disposition for all recorded arrests; all individuals who have criminal history…”
Tarlton v. Saxbe, 407 F. Supp. 1083 (D.D.C. 1976). “21(a)(1) (90 day period for state-administered information systems); see 42 U.S.C. § 3771 (b) (Supp. III, 1973) (enabling statute with procedural requirements for state and local criminal history information systems funded through LEAA grants).”
Matter of Pittsburgh Action Against Rape, 428 A.2d 126 (Pa. 1981). “We also disagree with appellant's suggestion that the federal statute, see 42 U.S.C. § 3771 , and federal regulations, see 28 C.”
Miami Herald v. Jones, 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 95 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1981). “e Code of Metropolitan Dade County; (ii) the records sought contain material exempted by the ‘ ‘police secrets privilege’ ’; (iii) the records sought contain material the disclosure of which would violate the Constitutional right of privacy; (iv) inspection would so cripple law…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.