42 U.S.C. § 4371
Congressional findings, declarations, and purposes
Public Law 91–190, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is Pub. L. 91–190,
Pub. L. 91–224, title II, § 201,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases, 1971–2003 · leading case: Gulf Oil Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 693 P.2d 227 (Wyo. 1985).
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 693 P.2d 227 (Wyo. 1985). “Congress has recognized that even where extensive federal environmental legislation exists, the primary responsibility for implementing environmental policy rests with state and local governments.”
Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp., 401 U.S. 493 (1971). “114 , 42 U. S. C. § 4371 (1970 ed.), *510 while stating the general policy of Congress in protecting the environment, also states: "The primary responsibility for implementing this policy rests with State and local governments.”
Ethyl Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “; Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4371 et seq.; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Employees v. Rumsfeld, 413 F. Supp. 1224 (D.D.C. 1976). “, and the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4371 , et seq., in deciding to implement the realignment.”
State Ex Rel. Andrus v. Click, 554 P.2d 969 (Idaho 1976). “42 U.S.C. § 4371 (b) (2); see also 42 U.S.”
Bradford Twp. v. Illinois State Toll High. Auth., 463 F.2d 537 (7th Cir. 1972). “§ 4321 and § 4331; the Environmental Quality Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4371 ; Meeting of Public Agencies Act, Chapter 102 Ill.”
Kennedy v. United States, 643 F. Supp. 1072 (E.D.N.Y 1986). “, and the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4371 et seq., while their Ninth Claim purports to state a claim against the United States for violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”
Utah Env't Cong. v. Zieroth, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (D. Utah 2002). “Plaintiffs allege violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4371 et seq., and the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.”
United States v. Ciampitti, 583 F. Supp. 483 (D.N.J. 1984). “, an environmental review statute of greater scope and application than the CZMA, civil enforcement actions, such as the present case, do not constitute federal actions. See 40 CFR § 1508.18 (a). 9 .”
Heart Disease Rsch. Found., a Charitable Trust of the State of New York v. Gen. Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98 (2d Cir. 1972). “The latter does refer to the “Environmental Quality Act,” which Judge Tyler understandably took to mean the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 42 U. S.C. § 4371 et seq. Plaintiffs now tell us they really were referring to 42 U.”
Charles C. Allison v. Robert C. Froehlke, Sec'y of the Army, 470 F.2d 1123 (5th Cir. 1972). “Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4371 et seq.: the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934, as amended, 16 U.”
United States v. State of California, 403 F. Supp. 874 (E.D. Cal. 1975). “852 , and the National Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4371 , 84 Stat. 114 ; (3) The United States, by accepting assignments for permit applications and by submitting its own permit applications, has agreed to comply with California law in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.