42 U.S.C. § 5779
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997).
Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997). “, 42 U. S. C. § 5779 (a) (requiring state and local law enforcement agencies to report cases of missing children to the Department of Justice).”
City of Chi. v. Sessions, 321 F. Supp. 3d 855 (E.D. Ill. 2018). “Justice O'Conner cited 42 U.S.C. § 5779 (a) as an example of such a federal statute, which requires state and local law enforcement agencies to report cases of missing children to the DOJ.”
Printz v. United States, 854 F. Supp. 1503 (D. Mont. 1994). “§ 402 (a) (requiring states to report traffic fatality data to the Department of Transportation). 27 .”
Koog v. United States, 852 F. Supp. 1376 (W.D. Tex. 1994). “At the hearing Plaintiff illustrated this broad reading of the Tenth Amendment by suggesting that the duties placed on state law enforcement agencies to report cases of missing children, 42 U.S.C. § 5779 (a), and traffic fatality data, 23 *1388 U.”
Mack v. United States, 66 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 1995). “The obligation imposed on state officers by the Brady Act is no more remarkable *1030 than, say, the federally-imposed duties of state officers to report missing children, 42 U.S.C. § 5779 (a), or traffic fatalities, 23 U.”
Am. Ass'n for Lost Child. v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 977 A.2d 595 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009). “§§ 5771-5778 , and the National Child Search Assistance Act of 1990 (Child Search Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 5779 -5780a, [6] the Association maintains that the government has a burden to provide law enforcement officers to find missing or abducted children and that its activities…”
City of New York v. United States, 971 F. Supp. 789 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). “, 42 U.S.C. § 5779 (a) (requiring state and local law enforcement agencies to report cases of missing children to the Department of Justice).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.