42 U.S.C. § 705
MEMBERSHIP.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1968–2020 · leading case: United States v. Frazer, 317 F. Supp. 1079 (M.D. Ala. 1970).
United States v. Frazer, 317 F. Supp. 1079 (M.D. Ala. 1970). “90-248, Title III, §§ 301, 304(a) ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 705 (a) (3)); Child Welfare Services, P.”
United States Ex Rel. Clark v. Frazer, 297 F. Supp. 319 (M.D. Ala. 1968). “90-248, Title III, §§ 301, 304(a) ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 705 (a) (3)); Child Welfare Services, P.”
Albino v. City of Chicago, 578 F. Supp. 1487 (N.D. Ill. 1983). “In order to receive funds, a state must have a plan which complies with the conditions set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 705 (1981). Section 705(a)(6) requires a state plan to “provide for payment of the reasonable cost of inpatient hospital services provided under the plan.”
Florida Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Califano, 449 F. Supp. 274 (N.D. Fla. 1978). “§ 602 (a)(3) (Aid to Families with Dependent Children); 42 U.S.C. § 705 (a)(2) (Maternal and Child Health); 20 U.”
Florida Dept. of Health, Etc. v. Califano, 449 F. Supp. 274 (N.D. Fla. 1978). “§ 602 (a)(3) (Aid to Families with Dependent Children); 42 U.S.C. § 705 (a)(2) (Maternal and Child Health); 20 U.”
Cooper v. Berger (N.C. Ct. App. 2019). “42 U.S.C. § 705 (2018). By statute, “[t]he State health agency of each State shall be responsible for the administration (or supervision of the administration) of programs carried out with [MCHBG] allotments.”
Cooper v. Berger (N.C. 2020). “42 U.S.C. § 705 (a); id. § 709(b). The funds issued under the program must then be spent in accordance with that application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.